摘要
从1981年加拿大最高法院采用合同A/B方法以来,这种分析方法就成了加拿大法院解决投标过程中的法律纠纷的分析框架。本文概述了30年来加拿大在此领域的发展、进化,并将加拿大与英国对待此问题所采用的不同方法进行了比较。作者认为,尽管加拿大的方法存在一些缺点,这种合同A/B分析框架本身的灵活性很适用于解决投标中的法律纠纷。
Since 1981,the Contract A/Contract B analysis articulated by Supreme Court of Canada in R.v Ron Engineering ＆ Construction （Eastern） Ltd. has been used as the framework for analyzing legal issues arising from the tendering process.The purpose of this article is to review the three-decade development in the Canadian law of tendering.The author also offers a comparison between the Canadian and English approach in the tendering cases, arguing that despite its shortcomings,the Contract A/Contract B framework is flexible enough to enable effective and fair adjudication of issues arising from the tendering process.
出处
《中国建材科技》
2013年第3期64-67,72,共5页
China Building Materials Science & Technology
关键词
建筑
投标法
加拿大
construction
law of tendering
Canada
