期刊文献+

微柱凝胶法和试管法检测孕妇IgG血型抗体效价分析 被引量:7

Detection of IgG antibody titer in serum of pregnant woman with micro-column gel Coombs test and test tube Coombs test
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较微柱凝胶法和传统试管法检测O型孕妇血型抗体效价的差异,探讨微柱凝胶试剂卡检测孕妇IgG效价的界值。方法:用微柱凝胶试剂卡和试管抗人球蛋白平行检测O型血孕妇血清IgG抗体效价。结果:微柱凝胶试剂卡比试管法检测数高2个稀释度,微柱凝胶试剂以1∶256为界值与试管法比较,阳性检出率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),结果一致性较好(χ2=191.340,P<0.01,Kappa指数=0.542)。结论:两种试剂检测的一致性好,使用微柱凝胶卡比试管法操作更简单,结果更易判读,值得临床推广。本研究推荐其临床参考值应设为≥1∶256。 Objective : To explore the micro - column gel Coombs test and test tube Coombs test for IgG titre detection in serum of pregnant women with blood type O, and to establish the critical titre for IgG micro - column gel Coombs test. Methods : Blood samples of pregnant women with blood type O were detected simultaneously by the micro - column test and the tube test. Results : On average, two titers higher was found with the micro - column gel Coombs test than with the test tube Coombs test. No statistically significant difference in the positive rate was found between the two methods with 1:256 of micro -column gel reagent as the field value (P 〉0.05). The two methods had a high correlation (X2 = 191. 340,P 〈0. 01,Kappa index: 0. 542). Conclusion: The two detection reagents are in good consistency. The method of micro - column gel Coombs test is simpler, more standardized and its result is easier to judge, resulting in more worthy of clinical use. In addition, the clinical reference value suggested by this study should be not less than 1:256.
作者 刘燕 郭一星
出处 《中国计划生育学杂志》 2013年第7期464-465,471,共3页 Chinese Journal of Family Planning
关键词 微柱凝胶抗人球蛋白试验 试管抗人球蛋白试验 IGG抗体效价 Micro -column gel Coombs test Test tube Coombs test IgG antibody titre
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

共引文献26

同被引文献44

  • 1曹颖,冯丽瑾,吴元健.两种方法检测孕妇IgG抗A(B)的比较分析[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2008,18(3):423-424. 被引量:1
  • 2曹文武,刘渝霞.153份母婴ABO血型不合新生儿溶血样本检测结果分析[J].中国输血杂志,2005,18(6):494-495. 被引量:35
  • 3国家药典委员会.中国药典(三部)[s].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2010:111-114.
  • 4金汉珍,黄德珉,官希吉.实用新生儿学.3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.508.
  • 5Langston MM, Procter JL, Cipolone KM, et ol. Evaluation of gel system for ABO grouping and D typing [J]. Transfusion, 1999, 39 (3) : 300-305.
  • 6Alwar V, Devi AM, Sitalakshmi S, et al. Evaluation of the use of gel card system for assessment of direct coombs test: weighing the pros and cons [J]. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus, 2012, 28 ( 1 ): 15-18.
  • 7Padmore RF. Hemolysis upon intravenous immunoglobulin transfusion [J]. Transfus Apher Sei, 2012, 46 ( 1 ) : 93-96.
  • 8Morgan S, Sorensen P, Vercellotti G, et al. Haemolysis after treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin due to anti-A [J]. Transfus Med, 2011, 21 (4): 267-270.
  • 9Lapierre Y, Rigal D, Adam J, et al. The gel test: a new way to detected cell antigen-antibody reactions [J]. Transfusion, 1990, 30 (2): 109-113.
  • 10Novaretti MC, Jens E, Pagliarini T, et ol. Comparison of con- ventional tube test with diamed gel microcolumn assay for anti-D titration [J]. Clin Lab Haematol, 2003, 25 (5) : 311-315.

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部