摘要
政治经济学研究必须警惕两种不良倾向:非批判的科学主义和庸俗化的辩证法主义。体现在劳动价值论的研究上,就是总要试图确立这样或那样的知识和概念体系,用作理论研究或应用分析的一劳永逸的出发点和可靠基础。这种不良的研究方法和认识企图遮掩了马克思的真实理论旨趣。真正含义的马克思劳动价值论是实践态的历史理论,其要点有二:一是其归根到底是要指向真实对象——历史生产,因此,围绕生产规定的发生学建构理论将自身内在构造呈现出来;二是它形成历史与逻辑统一的具体方式是将理论和认识始终看成"被生产的",服从一个总的认识对象范畴——生产关系。基于这一意蕴,范畴的方法不过是在例解与说明历史的方法。马克思劳动价值论的实践命题消解了各种形式主义争论,使理论域的逻辑争议问题还原为实践域中的历史认识问题。
Political Economy must be aware of two bad tendencies： uncritical scientism and vulgarization of the dialectics of Marxism. The reflection in the Labor Theory of Value Research is the trial to establish a system of knowledge and the concept which can he a starting point for the theoretical research and a reliable foundation for analysis. Such poor research methods and understanding is attempting to cover up the real purport of Marx＇s theory. The true meaning of Marxist labor theory of value is the historical theory of the practice of state with two main points： first, the analysis is to point to the real object, thus the historical production, so it constructs the theories centered with embryology to reveal its own internal structure; second, the formation of a unified way of history and logic is to regard the theory and understanding ＂produced＂ and to subject to an overall understanding of object areas： relations of production. Based on this implication, category-based method is a way to illustrate and describe the history. The practice of Marxist labor theory of value eliminates the controversy of diverse formalism, while reverts the logic controversies in theoretical domain to the problem of the historical understanding in the practical domain.
出处
《政治经济学评论》
CSSCI
2013年第3期105-128,共24页
China Review of Political Economy
关键词
历史
劳动价值论
对偶
发生
价值实体
价值形式
history, the labor theory of value, the dual form of value duality, occurrence, the entity of value
