期刊文献+

硼砂制取工艺生命周期环境影响评价探讨 被引量:1

Assessment analysis of the life cycle of borax preparation process
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了系统地评估硼砂(Na2B4O7.10H2O)两种制取工艺(即加压碱解法及碳碱法)全流程对环境的影响,利用工业生态学中改进的AT&T矩阵系统评价方法,结合硼砂企业生产实际,对加压碱解法及碳碱法两种硼砂制取工艺过程进行了量化评估及特性对比。通过因子-累积环境效应对比得出,两种工艺的材料、能耗点差异小,但它们的固废点、液废点、气废点差异较大。由于受多种因素影响,二者在流程上都比较紧凑,两种工艺的碱分解率、B2O3总收率和碱利用率都较高。阶段-累积环境效应对比表明,在开采及提取加工阶段,碳碱法的累积环境效应明显小于加压碱解法;在再生处置阶段,两种工艺的资源利用率都偏低,分别为11.5/20、9/20;在工业化探索放大阶段,由于引入清洁生产工艺,碳碱法取得了较好的效果。过程综合指标评价表明,工艺、产品和工厂3种生命周期评价的分值大体呈上升趋势,均是碳碱法较高。依据过程综合指数模型,加压碱解法及碳碱法的过程综合指数分别为49.5%、53.3%。 The present paper is to introduce our assessment analysis of the life cycle of borax preparation process byway of quantitative evaluation and contrastive compression with the alkaline degradation method and alkali carbonate method. At the same time, we have also analyzed the impact of the preparation methods on the resource env-i ronment and the in-situ condition of borax production fromthe point of view of the industrial eco-environment. The results prove that through the contrastive analysis of the factor-cumulative environmental effects on the material and energy consumption, no much difference can be found between the alkaline degradation method and alkali carbonate method, and neither is found the difference among the solid waste point, liquid waste point, and gaswaste from the point of viewof the production processing methods. However, the alkali decomposition rate, the total yield of B2O3and the alkali utilization rate tend all to be higher due tothe effects of a number of factors. Throughthe stagecumulative environmental effect contrastive analysis, it can be seen that the cumulative effect of alkali carbonate method on the eco-env-i ronmental health is obviously minor in mining and extraction processing stage. However, the resource utilization of the two processing methods are less efficient. To be exact, the decomposing rate of the compressive alkaline-degradation method and alkali carbonate method are 11.5/20 and 9/20 in regeneration disposal stage, respectively. Due to the introduction of cleaner production technology, the alkali carbonate method proves to be able to produce better effects in the industrialized exploration amplification stage. However, the comprehensive index evaluation of the compressive process method of alkaline degradation and alkali carbonate method indicate thatthe overall score of FLCA (Factory Life Cycle Assessment) is high. Whereas the decomposition rate of the alkaline degradation method and the alkali carbonate method are 55% and 58.5%, respectively, those of alkaline degradation method and alkali carbonate method turn to be 47% and 49%, respectively. With the minimum being the TLCA (Technology Life Cycle Assessment), the decomposition rate of the compressive alkaline degradation method is only 46.5% and that of the alkali carbonate method is 52.5%. Thus, based on the processing composite index model, composite indexes of the two processes turn out to be 49.5% and 53.3%.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期127-131,共5页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50874029) 国家863计划项目(2006AA06Z368) 河南理工大学博士基金项目(B2010-49)
关键词 环境工程学 硼砂 加压碱解法 碳碱法 生命周期评价 environmental engineering borax compression to alkaline degradation method alkali carbonate method LCA
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1ZHENG Xuejia(郑学家). Ludwigite processing(硼铁矿加工). Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2009: 67-69.
  • 2BANAR M, COKAYGIL Z. A comparative life cycle analysis of two different juice packages[J] . Environmental Engineering Science, 2008, 25(4): 549 555.
  • 3CROEZEN H, KAMPMAN B. The impact of ethanol and ETBE blending on refinery operations and GHG-emissions[J] . Energy Policy, 2009, 37(12): 5226 5238.
  • 4DUFOUR J, SERRANO D P, GALVEZ J L, et al. Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions[J] . International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(3): 1370-1376.
  • 5PASQUALINO J C, MENESES M, ABELLA M, et al. LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant[J] . & Technology, 2009, 43(9): 3300 3307.
  • 6任希珍,田晓刚,鞠美庭,孟伟庆.基于生命周期评价的中国铝业2000—2009年碳足迹研究[J].安全与环境学报,2011,11(1):121-126. 被引量:16
  • 7谭练武,颜可珍.公路建设项目全生命周期环境影响的多级模糊综合评价[J].安全与环境学报,2011,11(6):126-130. 被引量:9
  • 8杨建新,刘炳江.中国钢材生命周期清单分析[J].环境科学学报,2002,22(4):519-519. 被引量:41
  • 9GAO Feng(高峰), NIE Zuoren(聂祚仁), WANG Zhihong(王志宏), et al. Resource depletion and environmental impact analysis of magnesium produced using pidgeon process in China[J] . Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China(中国有色金属学报), 2006, 16(8): 1456-1461.
  • 10ZHENG Xuejia(郑学家). Production and application of boron compounds(硼化合物生产与应用)[M] . Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006: 40-43.

二级参考文献51

共引文献69

同被引文献22

  • 1夏添,邓超,吴军.生命周期评价清单分析的算法研究[J].计算机工程与设计,2005,26(7):1681-1683. 被引量:15
  • 2刘涛,黄志甲.生命周期清单不确定性分析的主要数据选择[J].安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,23(1):91-95. 被引量:12
  • 3樊庆锌,敖红光,孟超.生命周期评价[J].环境科学与管理,2007,32(6):177-180. 被引量:67
  • 4Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry(SETA). Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a code of practice [M]. Brussels: SETAC Europe, 1993.
  • 5WALTER K. Allocation rule for open-loop recycling in life cycle assessment[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1996, 1(1): 27-31.
  • 6KARLSSON R. LCA as a guide for the improvement of recycling[C]// Proceedings of the European Workshop on Allocation in LCA . Leiden: Institute of Environmental Sciences, 1994: 18-28.
  • 7MICHAEL H, WENZEL H. Environmental assessment of products [M]. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997: 541-565.
  • 8VIGON B W, TOLLE D A, COMABY B W, et al. Life cycle assessment: inventory guide lines and principles [M]. Cincinnati: EPA Press, 1993: 87-93.
  • 9RAYMOND R. Using fuzzy numbers to propagate uncertainty in matrix-based LCI[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 13(7): 585-592.
  • 10DENG Nansheng(邓南圣), WANG Xiaobing(王小兵). Life cycle assessment (生命周期评价)[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2003: 103.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部