期刊文献+

《联合国海洋法公约》在南海争端中的效用及中国对策 被引量:1

The Effectiveness of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the South China Sea Dispute and China’s Countermeasures
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国是一个负责任的大国,作为《联合国海洋法公约》的签署国,维护公约的精神和严肃性是我们应尽的义务。我们既需要坚持公平和正义的原则,保持航道畅通和航行自由,又必须援引公约,捍卫在领海的主权和专属经济区及大陆架内的主权权利,坚决反对某些国家恶意利用公约,并以公约之名行侵犯中国权利之实。本文围绕相关国家对公约的不同释义而产生的分歧,探讨公约在争端解决中的优势与缺失,以及其在南海争端中应发挥的效用。 China is a responsible big country. As a signatory of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, not only it is China' s obligation to maintain the spirit and the seriousness of the Convention, it is required to stick to the principles of fairness and justice so as to keep the channels open and the freedom of navigation maintained, but also to defend the sovereignty of the territorial sea and the rights and interests in exclusive economic zone and continental shelf of China by invoking the Convention, and should be firmly opposed to the ac- tivity that some countries maliciously violate China' s right under the guise of the Convention. By analyzing the different interpretation of the Convention on the part of relevant countries, this paper is intended for exploring the advantages and shortcomings of the Convention in dispute settlement, and the utilities the Convention should have in the South China Sea dispute.
作者 李洁宇
机构地区 海南省委党校
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 2013年第5期14-23,共10页 Pacific Journal
关键词 《联合国海洋法公约》 南海争端 争端解决机制 中国对策 the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea South China Sea dispute dispute settlement mechanism countermeasures of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Clive R. Symmons, Historical Waters in the Law of the Sea, Martinus Nijhoff, 2008, p. 60.
  • 2"The Island of Palmas Case, Arbitral Award of 4 April 1928", Report of International Arbitral Awards, Vol. II, pp. 854 - 855.
  • 3中国人民解放军总参谋部测绘局主编.《中国军事百科全书·中国军事地理分册》,军事科学出版社,1994年版,第160页.
  • 4鞠海龙,宋燕辉.论当前中国和平维护南海权益的国际环境[J].东南亚研究,2011(4):45-54. 被引量:10
  • 5郭渊.2011年日本南海政策回顾[J].东南亚研究,2011(6):4-9. 被引量:9
  • 6Robert Beckman, "China, UNCLOS and the South China Sea" ,Paper Submitted to the Third Biennial Conference of Asian Socie- ty of Intemaitonal Law, August, 2011 ,p. 14.
  • 7Marianne P. Gaertner, "The Disputes Settlement Provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea. Critique and Alternatives to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea", San Diego Law Re- v/ew, Vol. 19, 1982, pp. 589 - 600.
  • 8吴士存著.《南海争端的起源与发展》,中国经济出版社,2010年版,第138页.
  • 9Francisco Orrego Vicuna, The Exclusive Economic Zone.Re- girae and'Legal Nature under Internaitonal Law, Cambridge University Press, 1989,p. 106.
  • 10Marius Gjetnes, "The Spratly. Are They Rocks or Island?", Ocean Development&lnternaitonal Law, Vol. 32, 2001, pp. 191 - 204.

二级参考文献170

  • 1王传剑.日本的南中国海政策:内涵和外延[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2011,28(3):100-110. 被引量:16
  • 2中内清文,邵津.东中国海和日本海的划界问题[J].国外法学,1980(4):52-55. 被引量:4
  • 3张建岗.战后日本与东盟经济往来轨迹探析[J].东南亚纵横,2006(5):38-42. 被引量:4
  • 4Case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine), Judgment of 3 February 2009, p. 33.
  • 5Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, (Qatar v. Bahrain), ICJ Reports, 2001, pp. 115 - 117.
  • 6Permanent Court of Arbitration, Eritrea - Yemen Arbitration, Award of 9 October, 1998 (the First Stage: Territorial Sovereignty and Scope of the Dispute), p. 147.
  • 7Permanent Court of Arbitration, Eritrea - Yemen Arbitration, Award of 17 December, 1999 ( Second Stage: Maritime Delimitation), p. 38, p. 48.
  • 8Case Concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea ( Nicaragua/Honduras), ICJ Reports, 2007, pp. 26 - 27.
  • 9D . P. O' Connell, The International Law of the Sea, Volume II, Clarendon Press, 1984, p. 720.
  • 10Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, (Qatar v. Bahrain), ICJ Reports, 2001, p. 104, p. 117.

共引文献51

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部