期刊文献+

欧盟民主扩展的多元路径及其动因分析

The Multiple Approaches and Causes of EU's Democracy Promotion
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 冷战后,欧盟对外民主扩展的实施采用有区分的多元路径,民主扩展效果呈现差异性:针对中东欧国家,通过扩大进程来扩展民主,效果最为明显和成功;针对西巴尔干国家,综合运用扩大进程和稳定与联系进程来扩展民主,效果不一,但整体朝着民主化的积极方向发展;针对南地中海国家和欧盟东部邻国,通过欧洲邻国政策来扩展民主,效果整体一般且水平不一。欧盟民主扩展路径和效果差异是欧盟与目标国之间的权力关系和制度关系结构、欧盟自身的结构、目标国的国内政治情境、欧盟的战略利益考量等多个动因综合作用的结果。这也使得未来欧盟民主扩展充满变动性和不确定性。 Durin g the post-Cold-War period,EU's democracy promotion has been implemented by differentiated multi p le approaches which are based on the geopolitical proximity between EU and its neighbors.In the case of former communist states in Central and Eastern Europe,EU has promoted democracy through the enlargement process.In the case of the Western Balkans,EU has tried to promote democracy by Stabilisation and Association Process,su pp lemented by the enlargement process.As for the South Mediterranean and Eastern Euro p ean countries,EU's prescription for democratization is European Neighbourhood Policy.The enlargement p rocess has fairly succeeded in promoting democracy.In the framework of SAP,EU's democracy promotion has witnessed great progress in some Western Balkan countries,and little progress in other Western Balkan countries.The progress of EU's democracy promotion in the South Eastern European countries has been unsat-isfactor y and uneven.The choice of approaches to promote democracy by EU depends on asymmetrical power relationshi p and institutional relationship between EU and the target country,the target country's domestic p olitics,EU's internal institutional relations and decision-making rules,and EU's strategic concerns.All of these driving forces offer us a changing and uncertain future for EU's democracy promotion in its neighboring states.
作者 石贤泽
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期51-56,80-81,共6页 International Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1"Announcement: The Nobel Peace Prize for 2012", Oslo, 12 October, 2012, http://nobelpeaceprize, org/en _ GB/ laureates/laureates-2012/announce-2012/, 访问日期:2013年3月2日.
  • 2赵晨.欧盟如何向外扩展民主:历史、特点和个案分析[J].世界经济与政治,2007(5):14-21. 被引量:5
  • 3刘建飞.欧盟对外政策中的民主因素[J].新远见,2006,0(11):32-42. 被引量:1
  • 4Thomas M. Franck, "The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance", The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 86, No.l, 1992, p.89.
  • 5Christopher Hobson, "The Limits of Liberal-Democracy Pro- motion", Alternatives : Global, Local, Political, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2009, p. 384.
  • 6Ian Manners, "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?" Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002, p. 241.
  • 7Resolution of the the Council and of the Member States in the Council on Human Rights, Democracy and Development, Bulletin of the European Communities, No. l 1, 1991.
  • 8Treaty on European Union, Article J. 1 (2), Maastricht, 7 February, 1992, available from: http://eur-lex, europa, eu/ en/treaties/dat/l1992M/htm/11992M, html # 0001000001,访问日期:2013年3月5日.
  • 9Treaty on European Union, Article 130u, Maastricht, 7 February, 1992, available from: http://eur-lex, europa, eu/ en/treaties/dat/l1992M/htm/l1992M, html # 0001000001,访问日期:2013年3月15日.
  • 10Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union, Article 21 (1), Official Journal of the European Union, C 83, Vol. 53, 30 March 2010.

二级参考文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部