期刊文献+

污水处理工艺的技术经济综合评价方法 被引量:6

Comprehensive Technical and Economic Evaluations of Sewage Treatment Processes
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用八种国内污水处理厂常见的工艺进行技术经济综合评价,包括普通曝气工艺、水解-好氧工艺、AB工艺、A/O工艺、A2/O工艺、交替式氧化沟工艺、一体化氧化沟工艺和SBR工艺.通过抽样调查分析比较了这些处理工艺的处理效果、经济水平和工程实施三大类13个评价因子,建立了多评价因子的参数评价体系并设定其中各项因子的权值.评价采用模糊数学的改进方法,并将评价结果与专家评价进行比较.结果表明:A2/O,A/O和交替式氧化沟三大工艺较为适用于大中型城市建设中的污水处理厂,其中A2/O的表现尤为突出. Comprehensive technical and economic evaluations were performed for eight kinds of domestic sewage treatment processes commonly used in wastewater treatment plants in China, including conventional aeration, hydrolysis-aerobic process, adsorption biodegradation (AB) method, anacrobic oxic (A/O) method, (A2/O) anaerobic-anoxic-Oxic method, alternating type oxidation ditch, integrated oxidation ditch and sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Three major categories of total 13 evaluation factors, including treatment effect, economic aspect and project implementation were analyzed and compared through a sampling investigation. A multi-factor evaluation system was established and the factor weights were set. Evaluations were performed with fuzzy mathematics method and the results were compared with those of expert evaluations. Research results show that A2/O, A/O and oxidation ditch are more applicable to the sewage treatment plants in large or medium-sized cities, among which A2/O is particularly prominent.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期869-874,931,共7页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划(2009BAC62B03) 国家自然科学基金(51208368)
关键词 城市污水 处理工艺 技术评价 经济评价 评价 体系 urban sewage treatment process technicalevaluation economic evaluation evaluation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Xu P, Valette F, Brissaud F, et al. Technical-economic modelling of integrated water management., wastewater reuse in a French island[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2001, 43 (10):67.
  • 2Chowdhury S, Husain T. Evaluation of drinking water treatment technology: an entropy-based fuzzy application[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2006, 132(10) : 1264.
  • 3Thawale P, Ghosh T, Singh S, et al. Agro-economic evaluation of water resource project--a modeling approach [ J ]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2012, 184 ( 4 ) 2575.
  • 4Li X Y, Dai D S, Zhang K. Analysis on fuzzy integrated method of engineering project risk evaluation [ C ]// International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management. Hong Kong:[s.n.], 2003: 52-55.
  • 5Zbang TF, Yan J, Zhang X, et al. Research on the risk assessment of engineering project based on grey theory and fuzzy mathematics [C]// 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. Dalian: [s. n. ], 2008,10724-10728.
  • 6刘涛.2010中国污水处理厂名录[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2010.
  • 7Rahman S, Zayed T. Condition assessment of water treatment plant components[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2009, 23(4): 276.
  • 8Aragones-Beltran P, Pastor-Ferrando J P, Garcia-Garcia F. An analytic network process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain) [J]. Journal of Enviromental Management, 2010, 91(5) :1071.

同被引文献48

  • 1范彬.日本农村生活污水治理的组织管理与启示[J].水工业市场,2010(1):24-27. 被引量:22
  • 2李凡修,梅平,陈武.多元集对模型在污水处理厂改造决策中应用[J].环境科学与技术,2004,27(6):92-94. 被引量:8
  • 3Arias M E, Brown M T. Feasibility of using constructed treatment wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in the Bogotd Savannah, Colombia [ J ]. Ecol Eng,2009,35 (7) :1070 - 1078.
  • 4Molinos-Senante M, Garrido-Baserba M, Reif R, et al. Assessment of wastewater treatment plant design for small communities:environmental and economic aspects [ J]. Sci Total Environ,2012,427/428 : 11 - 18.
  • 5Molinos-Senante M, Hern~ndez-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R,et al. Economic feasibility study for intensive and ex- tensive wastewater treatment considering greenhouse ga- ses emissions [ J ]. J Environ Manage, 2013,123 : 98 - 104.
  • 6Tecle A, Fogel M, Duckstein L. Muhicriterion selection of wastewater management ahernatives [ J ]. J Water Re- sour Plan Manage, 1988,1 lg (g) : 383 - 398.
  • 7Kalbar P P, Karmakar S, Asolekar S R. Technology as- sessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attrib- ute decision-making[J]. Technol Soc,2012,34(4) :295 - 302.
  • 8Kalbar P P, Karmakar S, Asolekar S R. Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario- based multiple-attribute decision-making approach [ J ]. J Environ Manage ,2012,113 : 158 - 169.
  • 9Rodriguez-Garcia G, Molinos-Senante M, Hospido A, et al. Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants[J]. Water Res,2011,45 (18) :5997 -6010.
  • 10Machado A P,Urbano L,Brito A G,et al. Life cycle as- sessment Of wastewater treatment options for small and decentralized communities [ J ]. Water Sci Technol, 2007,56(3 ) : 15 - 22.

引证文献6

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部