期刊文献+

全麻与腰麻剖宫产术后患者静脉自控镇痛疗效比较 被引量:12

A comparison of postoperative pain control by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean sections
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较全麻与腰麻剖宫产术后患者静脉自控镇痛(patient controlled intravenous analgesia,PCIA)的疗效。方法实施剖宫产(cesarean section,CS)并且愿意接受术后镇痛的产妇120例,分为全麻组与腰麻组各60例,术毕均接静脉电子镇痛泵。观察两组48 h内各随访时点的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、镇痛泵使用时间、按压次数(D1)、实际进入次数(D2)及产妇满意度评分。结果在术后1~2、4、16及24 h时间点,腰麻组的VAS评分、D1/D2明显低于全麻组(P<0.05),镇痛泵使用时间长于全麻组(P<0.05),产妇满意度高于全麻组(P<0.05)。结论腰麻后PCIA效果优于全麻,麻醉方式的选择可能会给患者术后镇痛带来不同影响。 Objective To compare postoperative pain control by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) in parturient women undergoing cesarean section(CS) using general versus spinal anesthesia. Methods " Sixty cases of parturient who willing to accept postoperative pain manage from June 2010 to June 2012 were enrolled and divided into general anesthesia group and spinal anes- thesia group. After CS procedure, the two groups of patients received intravenous electronic analgesia pump. Quality of the patients" pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale at rest, and maternal satisfaction score was also evaluated by VAS. The demographic data and analgesia pump use time, press the number of times ( D1, demand) and the actual number of entrances ( D2 delivery), and incidence of complications were recorded in both groups. Results At postoperative 1 - 2 h ,4 h, 16 h and 24 h time points VAS scores in the spi- nal anesthesia group were significantly lower than that in the general anesthesia group( P 〈 0.05 ). The time of analgesia pump use in the spinal anesthesia group was longer than that in the general anesthesia group( P 〈 0.05 ). The D1/D2 in the spinal anesthesia group was lower than that in the general anesthesia group( P 〈 0. 05 ). The maternal satisfaction of the spinal anesthesia group was higher than that of the general anesthesia group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Condusion Spinal anesthesia is comparable to general anesthesia in terms of post-op- erative pain control. The type of anesthesia in CS may have a different effect on post-operation pain.
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2013年第4期142-144,共3页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
基金 资阳市科技局2011年科研课题(编号:资科A020333)
关键词 剖宫产 患者自控镇痛 全麻 腰麻 术后疼痛 Cesarean section Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia General anesthesia Spinal anesthesia Postoperative
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献46

  • 1Findley I, Chamberlain G. ABC of labour care: relief of pain[J]. BMJ,1999,318(3) :927-930.
  • 2Bonica J J, Chadwick HS. Labour pain [M].//Wall PD. Test-book of pain. 2 nd ed. New York : Churchill Living Stone, 1996 :482-499.
  • 3ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion, number 269, February 2002. Analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2002,99( 1 ) :69-70.
  • 4Malone FD,C, eary M, Chelmow D,et al. Prolonged labor in nulliparas:lessons from the active management of labor[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1996,88(2) :211-215.
  • 5Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, et al. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1993,169(4) :851-858.
  • 6Chen LK, Hsu HW, Lin C J, et al. Effects of epidural fentanyl on labor pain during the early period of the first stage of induced labor in nulliparous women[ J]. J Formos Med Assoc ,2000,99 :549-553.
  • 7Chestnut DH, McGrath JM, Vincent RD, et al. Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are in spontaneous labor? [J]. Anesthesiology, 1994,80(6) :1201-1208.
  • 8Blair JM, Hill DA, Fee JPH. Patient-controlled analgesia for labour using remifentanil: a feasibility study [J]. Br J Anaesth,2001,87(3) : 415-420.
  • 9Volmanen P,Akural E, Raudaskoski T, et al. Comparison of remifentanil and nitrous oxide in labour analgesia [J]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2005,49 ( 4 ) :453-458.
  • 10Blair JM,Dobson GT,Hill DA, et al. Patient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidine[ J].Anaesthesia,2005,60( 1 ) :22-27.

共引文献182

同被引文献78

  • 1吕萍.盐酸罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼硬膜外麻醉无痛分娩效果分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2013,5(2):27-28. 被引量:12
  • 2徐铭军.产科麻醉与镇痛新进展[J].中国继续医学教育,2010,2(4):80-89. 被引量:24
  • 3夏云.目前产科麻醉中的热点讨论[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2007,28(4):380-384. 被引量:45
  • 4刘保江,晁储璋.麻醉护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:69-108.
  • 5McDonnell JG, O' Donnell BD, Farrell T, et al. Transversus abdomi- nis plane block: a cadaveric and radiological evaluation [ J ]. Reg Anesth Pain Med ,2007 ;32 (5) :399-404.
  • 6Abdallah FW, Halpern SH, Margarido CB. Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery per- formed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analy- sis[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2012,109(5) :679-687.
  • 7Gadsden J, Hart S, Santos AC. Post-cesarean delivery analgesia [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2005,101 (5 Suppl) :62-69.
  • 8Pan PH. Post cesarean delivery pain management: multimodal ap- proach [ J ]. Int J Obstet Anesth,2006,15 ( 3 ) : 185-188.
  • 9Fassoulaki A, Staikou C, Melemeni A, et al. Anaesthesia preference, neuraxial vs. general, and outcome after caesarean section [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2010,30(8) :818 -821.
  • 10McDonnell JG,O'Donnell BD,Farrell T. Transversus abdominis plane block.:a cadaveric and radiological evaluation[J].{H}Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2007,(05):399-404.

引证文献12

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部