广义资本视角下企业社会责任内涵界定被引量：6

Connotation of Corporate Social Responsibility based on Generalizing Capital

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过文献回顾发现,不同的企业本质观对企业社会责任内涵有不同理解。但受理论假定的局限,4类企业本质观导向形成的企业社会责任内涵无法完全弥合企业经济目标与社会目标之间的沟壑,进而难以有效指导企业社会责任实践。在对广义资本和企业本质进行剖析的基础上,将企业价值创造与价值分配过程相统一,对企业社会责任内涵进行了新的界定,并构建了企业财务资本责任、人力资本责任、市场社会资本责任、等级制社会资本责任和生态资本责任五维度模型。最后,从政府层面提出了有针对性的政策建议。 Through the literature review, we find that different views of the nature of the firm result in different under- standings about connotation of corporate social responsibility. But limited by the theory premise, the connotation of corpo- rate social responsibility induced by four views about the nature of the firm cannot completely bridge the gulf between en- terprise economic goals and social goals, thus cannot effectively guide the practice of corporate social responsibility. Based on the analysis of generalizing capital and the nature of the firm, this paper makes enterprise value creation and value dis- tribution unified, and redefines the connotation of corporate social responsibility. Furthermore, this paper constructs the model of five dimensions, which concludes financial capital responsibility, human capital responsibility, responsibility of market social capital, responsibility of hierarchy social capital and ecological capital responsibility. Lastly, this paper puts forward some concrete suggestion from the angles of governments.

作者陈承王宗军

机构地区长江大学管理学院华中科技大学管理学院

出处《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期92-97,共6页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基金国家社会科学基金重大项目(11&ZD165)

关键词广义资本企业本质观企业社会责任 Generalizing Capital the Nature of the Firm Corporate Social Responsibility

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1LEVITT T. The dangers of social responsibility[J]. Har- vard Business Review, 1958, 36(5): 41-50.
2FRIEDMAN M, FRIEDMAN R D. Capitalism and freedom [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,2002.
3李伟阳.基于企业本质的企业社会责任边界研究[J].中国工业经济,2010(9):89-100. 被引量：45
4BOWEN H R. Social responsibility and accountability[M]. New York: New York University Press, 1953.
5DAVIS K. Can business afford to ignore social responsibili- ties[J]. California Management Review, 1960, 2(3): 70- 77.
6MCGUIRE J W. Business and society[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
7ZENISEK T J. Corporate social responsibility: a conceptu- alization based on organizational literature[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1979(4) : 359-368.
8STEINER G A. Business and soeiety[M]. New York: Ran- dom House, 1971.
9CARROLL A B. The pyramid of corporate social responsi- bility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders[J]. Business Horizons, 1991, 34(4): 39-48.
10弗里曼.战略管理:利益相关者管理方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2006.