社会化问答平台的答案质量评估——以“知乎”、“百度知道”为例被引量：80

Research on Assessment of Answer Quality in Social Q&A Platform

下载PDF

导出

摘要 Web2.0参与协作的方式使得社会化问答平台得到迅速的发展,随着平台问题和答案数量的积累,平台的质量日益成为人们关注的问题。本文通过对社会化问答平台答案质量的评估,从而了解目前国内社会化问答平台的质量水平及存在的问题,希望能对社会化问答平台的发展提供有益参考。 Social Q＆A platform in Web2.0 has experienced a rapid development through the manner of collaboration. As the social Q ＆ A platform has accumulated considerable amount of questions and answers, the quality of answers is increasingly becoming an issue of concern. Based on the assessment of answers quality in social Q＆A, this paper aims to understand the current level and problems of domestic social Q ＆ A, hoping to make a useful reference for the development of such platform.

作者贾佳宋恩梅苏环

机构地区武汉大学信息管理学院

出处《信息资源管理学报》 2013年第2期19-28,共10页 Journal of Information Resources Management

基金中国科学技术信息研究所系列项目"数字信息资源的质量评价研究"(1108325) 国家社会科学基金项目"参与协作式情报空间的构建与应用研究"(10CTQ016)的研究成果之一

关键词社会化问答答案质量质量评估知乎百度知道 Social Q＆A Quality of answers Quality assessment Zhihu Baidu

分类号 G350 [文化科学—情报学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Nam K K, Ackerman M S, Adamic LA. Questions in, knowledge in: a study of naver' s question answering community[A]/ /Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [ C]. New York : ACM Press, 2009: 779-788.
2Oh S. The relationships between motivations and answering strategies: An exploratory review of health answerers' behaviors in Yahoo I Answers [J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011,48(1): 1-9.
3Agichtein E, Castillo C, Donato D, et al. Finding high quality content in social media[A]//WSDM '08 Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining[C]. New York:ACM,2008: 183-194.
4Shah C, Pomerantz J. Evaluating and predicting answer qualityin community QA[A]/ /SIGIR ' 10 Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval[C]. New York: ACM,2010 :411-418.
5Kim S, Oh S. Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60( 4) : 716-727.
6Jeon J, Croft W B, Lee J H, et al. A framework to predict the quality of answers with non-textual features[A]/ /SIGIR '06 Proceedings of the 29rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval[C]. Washington: ACM, 2006:228-235.
7Ko J, Si L, Nyberg E. A probabilistic framework for answer selection in question answering[A]//Proceedings of NAACL-HLT[C]. Rochester, NY: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007: 524-531.
8Jurczyk P, Agichtein E. Discovering authorities in question answer communitiesby using link analysis[A]//Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management[C].Lisboa:ACM,2007:919-922.
9Liu J, Cao Y. Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization[A]/ /Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL)[C]. Prague,2007 :334-342.
10Sian J, Liu Y,Agichtein E, et al. Finding the right facts in the crowd: Factoid question answering over social media [A]//lnternational World Wide Web Conference Committee. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web[C]. Beijing: ACM, 2008: 467-476.