摘要
目的探讨不同途径经皮冠状动脉介入诊疗的心脏并发症影响因素与防治。方法我院自2010年8月至2012年8月收治择期行心脏介入诊疗患者200例,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各100例,治疗组患者经桡动脉途径穿刺,对照组患者经股动脉穿刺,观察两组患者住院时间、止血压迫时间,统计两组患者外周血管并发症。结果治疗组外周血管并发症2例,压迫时间6.3小时(h),住院时间5.33天(d);对照组外周血管并发症7例,压迫时间12.2小时(h),住院时间7.56天(d)。结论经桡动脉途径比经股动脉途径行心脏介入诊疗效果更好,住院时间更短。
Objective To investigate the influential factors for the cardiac complications of percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） via different routes and their prevention and treatment. Methods A total of 200 patients were admitted to our hospital from August 2010 to August 2012 to undergo scheduled PCI. These patients were randomly divided into treatment group （n=100） and control group （n=100）. The treatment group underwent PCI via the radial artery, while the control group underwent PCI via the femoral artery. The length of hospital stay and duration of compression hemostasis were measured, and the peripheral vascular complications were statistically analyzed. Results The treatment group had 2 cases of peripheral vascular complications, and the mean duration of compression hemostasis and mean length of hospital stay were 6.3 h and 5.33 d; the control group had 7 cases of peripheral vascular complications, and the mean duration of compression hemostasis and mean length of hospital stay were 12.2 h and 7.56 d. Conclusion Compared with PCI via the femoral artery, PCI via the radial artery has a better clinical effect and results in a shorter hospital stay.
出处
《心血管病防治知识（学术版）》
2013年第6期21-23,共3页
Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease
关键词
不同途径
经皮冠状动脉介入
诊疗
心脏并发症
影响
防治
Different routes
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Diagnosis and treatment
Cardiac complication
Influential
Prevention and treatment
