摘要
行政正当性证成的传统模式建立在严格的三权分立之基础上,从立法权处获取正当性资源。该模式以行政合法性原则和行政合理性原则作为重要支撑,并未超出"有限行政"的导向,即以行政的合规则性为根本目的。但是随着行政权的大举扩张,行政立法与行政裁量的大量存在使得行政权兼具了立法权和司法权的诸多属性,这种传统的模式在证成行政的正当性上十分乏力,使行政陷入了"合法性危机"。在这种情况下,行政正当性证成的模式亟待通过范式转化来获取正当性资源。新的模式关注行政权的自我控制,强调行政立法领域的社会控制,并通过正当程序保障行政决策的民主性基础,以期实现行政正当性的回归。
The traditional model of administrative legitimacy was strictly built on the basis of the separation of powers, and obtained the legitimate resources from the legislative power. This model was principally supported by the principle of administrative legality and administrative rationality, and did not exceed the guidance of ＂limited administration＂, which set administrative legality as a fundamental purpose. However, with the large-scale expansion of the administrative power, the existence of a large number of cases of administrative legislation and administrative discretion endowed administrative pow-er with many attributes of legislative power and judicial power. That traditional model was very fatigue to justify administrative legitimacy, and resulted in a ＂crisis of legitimacy＂. In this case, the model of administrative justification was in an urgent need to obtain legitimate resources through a paradigm shift. The new model focused on the self-control of executive power, emphasized the social control of administrative legislation, guaranteed the democratic basis of the administrative decision-making by due process to regain administrative legitimacy as a result.
出处
《福建行政学院学报》
2013年第2期82-88,共7页
Journal of Fujian Administration Institute
基金
2012年度国家社科基金重大转重点项目(12AZD060)
关键词
行政正当性
有限行政
合法性危机
行政权
Administrative legitimacy
Limited administration
Crisis of legitimacy
Administrative power
