期刊文献+

多模态话语分析的双重视角——社会符号观与概念隐喻观的连接与互补 被引量:106

The Dual Perspectives of Multimodal Discourse Analysis:The Connection and Complementarity Between Social Semiotics and Conceptual Metaphor Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 多模态话语分析在语言学领域主要有两个研究视角:基于系统功能语言学的社会符号学视角和基于认知语言学的概念隐喻视角。两个研究视角之间的连接与互补可以从语言学基础层面、语言哲学层面、语境层面、主体理论构建层面进行探讨。通过研究和实例分析表明这两个研究视角在理论范式上可相互连接,在话语分析实践中可相互补充。两者的结合可以有力地促进多模态话语分析理论的发展。 Multimodal discourse analysis (MDA) in linguistics can be approached mainly from two perspectives: the social semiotic perspective based on SFL and the conceptual metaphor perspective based on cognitive linguistics. The connection and complementarity between these two perspectives can be probed into in terms of the levels of their respective linguistic foundations, philosophical foundation, contextual level and theoretical formulation. Through case study and investigation, it is shown that the two perspectives share common grounds in their theoretical paradigms and can complement each other in MDA. The integration of the two perspectives can greatly promote the development of the theory of MDA.
机构地区 同济大学 烟台大学
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期20-28,共9页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 社会符号学 系统功能语言学 多模态隐喻 概念隐喻 social semiotics systemic functional linguistics muhimodal metaphor conceptual metaphor
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination ; Four Essays [ M ]. Michael Holquist, Caryl Emerson and MichaelHolquist (Trans. ) . Austin and London: University of Texas Press[ written during the 1930s] , 1981 ( 1930s).
  • 2Bateman, J., Delin, J. & R. Henschel. Multimodality and empiricism: Preparing for a corpus-based approachto the study of multimodal meaning-making [ A] . Yentola, E., Charles, C. & Kaltenbacher, M. Perspectives onMultimodality [ C ]. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 2004. 65 - 87.
  • 3Bernstein,B. Class,Codes and Control, Volume 1: Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language [ M ].London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971.
  • 4Caballero, R. Cutting across the senses : Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion [A]. Force ville, C.& E. Urios-Aparisi. Multimodal Metaphor [ C] . Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. 73 - 94.
  • 5El Refaie, E. Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses [A]. Forceville, C. & Urios-Apari-si ,E. Multimodal Metaphor [ C]. Berlin/New York : Mouton de Gruyter,2009. 173 - 196.
  • 6Forceville, C. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising [M], London: Routledge, 1996.
  • 7Forceville, C. Addressing an audience: Time, place, and Genre in Peter van Straaten’ s calendar cartoons[J]. Humor, 2005,(18) : 247-278.
  • 8Forceville, C. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research [A].Kristiansen, M. Chard, R. Driven & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanes. Cognitive Linguistics : Current Applications andFuture Perspectives [ C] . Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. 379 -402.
  • 9Foceville, C. Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials [ J ]. Public Journal of Semiotics 1,2007,(1): 19-51.
  • 10Forceville, C. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework; Agendas for research [A]. C.Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi. Multimodal Metaphor [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009.19 - 42.

二级参考文献43

  • 1Aristotle. The Rhetoric and the Poetics [M ]. New York: Random House, 1954.
  • 2Bakhtin, M. The Dialogic Imagination [ M ]. Emerson, C. & M. Holquist. ( trans. ). Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
  • 3Bakhtin. M. Problems in Dostoevsky's Poetics [ M ]. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
  • 4Bourdieu,P. Outline of a Theory of Practice[ M]. Cambridge,Cambridge University Press, 1977.
  • 5Chaney, D. Lifestyles[ M ]. London : Routledge, 1996.
  • 6Fairclough, N. Language and Power [ M ]. London:Pearson ESL, 2001.
  • 7Fairclough, N. Analysing Discourse : Textual Analysis for Social Research [ M ]. London : Routledge ,2003.
  • 8Gibson, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception [ M ]. Boston : Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
  • 9Halliday, M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning [ M ]. Maryland: Maryland University Park Press, 1978.
  • 10Halliday ,M. A. K. & R, Hasan. Language, Context and Text :A Social Semiotic Perspective [ M ]. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press,1989.

共引文献227

同被引文献890

引证文献106

二级引证文献492

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部