期刊文献+

基于冲突证据距离的DS合成方法研究

DS combination method research based on conflict evidence distance
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了解决现有对于高度冲突证据的合成方法存在的问题与不足,提出了一种新的合成方法.新方法以相似性质的冲突程度和相似系数为基元,利用改进的KL来计算得到证据距离,通过证据距离和中心证据的关系建立权值,权值反映了证据的重要程度,在已有的基本可信度分配函数中加入权值进行修正.最后通过改进的方法,得到合成结果.通过算例比较,表明新方法的合成结果更为理想,更加符合实际情形. Against the existing problems and shortage of conflict evidence combination method, one new improved method was studied. The conflict degree and similar coefficient have similar property, which both show the correlation of evidence, the evidence distance was calculated using them based on KL equation. According to the distance between with the central evidence, each evidence weight which reflects the importance of evidence was calculated, and then the existing distribution functions was amended. The final result was gotten by the improved combination methods. Example of comparison with other algorithm shows that the new method is more consistent with the actual situation.
作者 杜冬 魏永超
出处 《四川大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期499-502,共4页 Journal of Sichuan University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 中国民用航空总局科技项目(MHRD200925)
关键词 数据融合 证据合成 冲突 证据距离 权值 data fusion evidence combination conflict evidence distance weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Yang J B. Singh M G. An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributed decisions making with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans actions on System, Man and Cybernetics,2004,34(l): 1.
  • 2Smarandache F, Dezert J. Four versions of the proportional conflict redistribution rules of combination in information fusion[J]. Information Fusion, 2004, 41 (3): 386.
  • 3Yang J, Sen P. A general multilevel evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics,2006, 36 (0): 1458.
  • 4Duarte M, Hu Y H. Distance based decision fusion in a distributed wireless sensor network[J]. TelecommunicationSystems,2004,26 (224): 339.
  • 5XU L J ,Chen Y z.ce: P Y. Improvement of DS evidential theory in multisensor data fusion system[C]//Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. 2004(4): 3124.
  • 6Liu W. Analyzing t he degree of conflict among belief functions[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2006,170 (11) : 909.
  • 7kullback S. Letter to the Editor: the KullbackLeibler distance [J]. The American Statistician, 1987,41 (4): 340.
  • 8Yager R R. On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules [J]. Information Sciences, 1987,41(2) :93.
  • 9孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):116-119. 被引量:452

二级参考文献3

  • 1[1]Ronald R.Yager.On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules[J].Information Sciences,1987,41:93-137.
  • 2[2]G.Shafer.A mathematical theory of evidence[M].Princeton U.P.,Princeton,1976.
  • 3[3]A.P.Dempster.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J].Ann.Math.Statist.1967,38:325-339.

共引文献451

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部