期刊文献+

经脐单孔腹腔镜妇科手术47例临床分析 被引量:6

Clinical analysis of 47 cases of single-port transumbilical laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜妇科手术的可行性及疗效。方法选取我院2011年1月至2012年8月妇科手术病例共97例,将其随机分成两组,A组47例选择经脐单孔腹腔镜完成,B组50例选择传统多孔腹腔镜下完成,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间及术后离床活动时间、术后镇痛剂使用率。结果两组手术时间、术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组术后肛门排气时间、术后离床时间均短于B组,A组术后止痛药使用率低于B组,两组比较,其差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论如选择合适的病例,单孔腹腔镜妇科手术是可行的,与传统多孔腹腔镜手术相比,其具备更美容、更微创的优点。 Objective To study the feasibility and efficacy of single-port transumbilical laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Methods In our hospital from January 2011 to August 2012, 97 cases of gynecological surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Group A (n=47) applied single-port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery, group B (n=50) used traditional porous laparoscopic surgery. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative exhaust time and time offthe bed, postoperative analgesic usage were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the operation time, blood loss (P〉0.05). The anal exhaust time and time off the bed in group A were shorter than those in group B, and the postoperative analgesic use in group A was lower than that in group B, with statistically significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic gynecological surgery is feasible for appropriate cases, with more bcantiful and invasive advantages than traditional porous laparoscopic surgery.
作者 钟广春
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2013年第11期1685-1687,共3页 Hainan Medical Journal
关键词 单孔 腹腔镜 妇科 Single-hole Laparoscopic Gynaecology
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献54

  • 1朱清.输卵管结扎3142例分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2005,30(1):62-63. 被引量:2
  • 2刘彦.妇科微创手术学研究进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(1):15-17. 被引量:31
  • 3Bauer O, Devroey P, Wisanto A, Gerling W, Kaisi M, Diedrich K[ J ]. Small diameter laparoscopy using a microlaparoscope. Hum Reprod, 1995,10 (6) : 1461-1464.
  • 4Leggett PL, Bissell CD, Churchman-Winn R, Ahn C. Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients[ J]. Surg Endosc, 2001,15 ( 3 ) : 293-296.
  • 5Kagaya T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the "Twin-Port" system [ J ]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg,2001,8 ( 1 ) :76-80.
  • 6Wheeless C. A rapid,inexpensive and effective method of surgical sterilization by laparoscopy[ J]. J Reprod Med, 1969,3 (5) : 65-69.
  • 7Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA,3rd. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture [J]. N J Med,1991,88(10) :721-726.
  • 8Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA ,3rd. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy) [ J ]. J Reprod Med, 1992,37(7) :588-594.
  • 9Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy [ J ]. Br J Surg, 1997,84 (5) :695.
  • 10Cobellis G, Cruccetti A, Mastroianni L, Amici G, Martino A. One-trocar transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted management of Meckel's diverticulum in children [ J ]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2007,17 (2) :238-241.

共引文献282

同被引文献61

  • 1Marescaux J,Dallemagne B,Perretta S,et al.Surgery without sears:report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being[J].Arch-Surg,2007,142(9):823-826.
  • 2Fad AN,Escobar PF.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery(LESS)in gynecologic oncology:technique and initial report[J].Gynecoloncol,2009,114(2):157-161.
  • 3HIGGINS JP, GREEN S. Cochrane handbook for systematic re- views of interventions (version5.1.0)[cited 2012 Jan5] Available at: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 4CHEN YJ, WANG PH, OCAMPO EJ, et al. Single-port com- pared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterecto- my: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011, 117(4): 906-912.
  • 5JUNG YW, LEE M, YIM GW, et al. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 (8): 2462-2469.
  • 6YOON BS, PARK H, SEONG SJ, et al. Single-port versus con- ventional laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy: a com- parison of surgical outcomes [J]. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 2011, 159(1): 190-193.
  • 7YO0 EH, SHIM E. Single-port compared with three-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery in a randomized con- trolled trial [J]. The Journal of International Medical Research, 2013, 41(3): 673-680.
  • 8FANFANI F, FAGOTTI A, GAGLIARDI ML, et al. Minilaparo- scopic versus single-port total hysterectomy: a randomized trial [J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2013, 20 (2): 192-197.
  • 9EOM JM, KO JH, CHOI JS, et al. A comparative cross-see- tional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conven- tional laparoscopic surgery [J]. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2013, 167(1): 104-109.
  • 10张忠涛,周晓娜.经自然孔道内镜外科技术发展现状与展望[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(1):35-37. 被引量:49

引证文献6

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部