期刊文献+

高龄无保护左主干病变不宜行冠状动脉搭桥患者介入治疗效果评价 被引量:3

Coronary stenting of unprotected left main diseases in elderly patients unsuitable for coronary surgery
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)一直是左主干病变的首选治疗,关于高龄左主干病变但不宜行CABG治疗的患者临床研究较少。本研究针对这一特殊人群进行经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)治疗后的临床情况进行随访。方法:入选年龄≥75岁不宜行CABG治疗的无保护左主干病变患者,随访患者的临床终点事件,死亡、心源性死亡、心肌梗死及靶血管重建。结果:研究共入选115例高龄左主干病变患者。平均年龄(78.3±2.6)岁,平均Syntax评分和Euroscore评分为(29.3±6.1)和(7.8±4.2),随访总病死率是9.5%,心源性死亡、心肌梗死及靶血管重建率分别为7%,6.1%及6.1%,MACCE事件发生率为16.5%。男性和慢性肾功能不全与全因死亡显著相关。结论:PCI治疗为高龄不宜行CABG治疗的左主干患者提供了α-选择。男性和慢性肾功能不全与全因死亡显著相关。 Objective:Coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)is considered the standard treatment for unprotected left main coronary stenosis,few studies have reported on clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).We sought to assess clinical outcomes of elderly patients(age≥75years) undergoing PCI for unprotected left main stenosis not suitable for bypass surgery.Methods: ALL patients with unprotected left main stenosis were treated with stent implantation were consecutively enrolled.Primary outcome was the composite of death,myocardial infarction(MI),or target lession revascularization(TLR).Results: The study included 115 consecutive patients who were treated with drug-eluting stents.Mean age was(78.3±2.6)years,and mean Syntax score and EuroSCORE were(29.3±6.1)And(7.8±4.2),respectively.The overall mortality at the end follow up was 9.5%,the rates of major adverse cardiacdeath,nonfatal acute MI and target lesion revascularization were 7%,6.1%,6.1%,respectively.MACCE is 16.5%.Male and renal insufficiency was significantly related with all cause mortality.Conclusion: PCI treatment is feasible in elderly patients with unprotected left main stenosis who were not suitable for CABG.Male and renal insufficiency was predictors of poor prognosis.
出处 《心肺血管病杂志》 CAS 2013年第3期251-254,共4页 Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
关键词 左主干病变 高龄 冠状动脉介入治疗 COX回归分析 Left main coronary disease Eldly patients Percutaneous coronary intervention Cox regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Zaid D,Vinc R.Left main coronary stenting in a non surgical oc-togenarian population:a possible approach.Cardiovasc RevascMed,2012,13:119-124.
  • 2XM Wu,CP Liu.Long term outcome of percutaneous coronaryintervention for unprotected left main coronary disease.Int J Car-diol,2010,139:272-276.
  • 3Lee RJ,Shih KN,Lee SH,et al.Predictors of long-termout-comes in patients after elective stent implantation forunprotectedleft main coronary artery disease.Heart Vessels,2007,22:99-103.
  • 4Chieffo A,Park SJ,Valgimigli M,et al.Favorable long-termoutcome after drug-eluting stent implantation in nonbifurcation le-sions that involve unprotected left main coronary artery:a multi-center registry.Circulation,2007,116:158-162.
  • 5Tamburino C,Di Salvo ME,Capodanno D,et al.Are drugelut-ing stents superior to bare-metal stents in patients with unprotect-ed non-bifurcational left main disease?Insights from a multicentreregistry.Eur Heart J,2009,30:1171-1179.
  • 6Chieffo A,Stankovic G,Bonizzoni E,et al.Early and midtermresults of drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected leftmain.Circulation,2005,111:791-795.
  • 7Price MJ,Cristea E,Sawhney N,et al.Serial angiographic fol-low-up of sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coro-nary artery revascularization.J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,47:871-877.
  • 8Valgimigli M,Van Mieghem CA,Ong AT,et al.Short-andlong-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent implantationfor the percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery dis-ease:insights from the rapamycin-eluting and Taxus stent evalua-ted at rotterdam cardiology hospital registries(RESEARCH andT-SEARCH).Circulation,2005,111:1383-1389.
  • 9Park S,Kim Y,Lee B,et al.Sirolimus-eluting stent implanta-tion for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.J Am CollCardiol,2005,45:351-356.
  • 10Silvestri M,Barragan P,Sainsous J,et al.Unprotected left maincoronary artery stenting:immediate and medium-term outcomes of140 elective procedures.J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,35:1543-1550.

二级参考文献17

  • 1王桂红,郑华光,王伊龙,姜卫剑,王拥军.缺血性脑卒中患者颅内/外脑大动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的分布及其预测因素[J].中国卒中杂志,2006,1(8):543-547. 被引量:25
  • 2陈蕾,乔薇,焦媛,钱端,郑霄云,张小平.超高龄冠心病患者介入治疗的临床及并发症分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(21):6440-6442. 被引量:8
  • 3钱菊英,吴鸿谊,张峰,葛雷,樊冰,王齐兵,刘学波,葛均波.高龄急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床观察[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2007,9(6):379-381. 被引量:11
  • 4Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, et al. Arterial territories of the human brain: cerebral hemispheres. Neurology, 1998, 50 : 1699-1708.
  • 5Friday G, Sutter F, Curtin A, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities following off-pump cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum, 2005, 8 : E105-E109.
  • 6Gold JP, Charlson ME, Williams-Russo P, et al. Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass. A randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1995, 110:1302-1311.
  • 7Abu-Omar Y, Balacumaraswami L, Pigott DW, et al. Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization during off- pump, on-pump, and open cardiac surgery procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004, 127 : 1759-1765.
  • 8Peel GK, Stamou SC, Dullum MK, et al. Chronologic distribution of stroke after minimally invasive versus conventional coronary artery bypass. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 43:752-756.
  • 9Villareal RP, Hariharan R, Liu BC, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 43:742-748.
  • 10Mathew JP, fontes ML, Tudor IC, et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA, 2004, 291:1720-1729.

共引文献31

同被引文献16

  • 1吴小凡,吕树铮,陈韵岱,柳弘,卢燕玲.冠状动脉闭塞并重度钙化旋磨联合球囊成形和支架植入术一例[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(15):1072-1074. 被引量:2
  • 2Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart asso- ciation task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovas- cular angiography and interventions [ J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 124(23) :e574 - e651.
  • 3Bangalore S, Vlachos HA, Seizer F, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions : insights from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Regis- try[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc lnterv, 2011,77(1) :22 -28.
  • 4Tuzcu EM, Berkalp B, De Franco AC, et al. The dilemma of diag- nosing coronary calcification : angiography versus intravascular ultra- sound[J]. JAm Coll Cardiol, 1996, 27(4) :832 -838.
  • 5Scanlon P, Faxon D, Audet A, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for cor- onary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions [ J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 33(6) :1756 -1824.
  • 6Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, et al. American College of Car- diology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert ConsensusDocument on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents [ J ]. J Am Coll Car- diol, 2001, 37(8) :2170 -2214.
  • 7Tanigawa J, Barlis P, Di Mario C. Heavily calcified coronary lesions preclude strut apposition despite high pressure balloon dilatation and rotational atherectomy: in vivo demonstration with optical coherence tomography [ J ]. Circ J, 2008, 72 ( 1 ) : 157 - 160.
  • 8Ehara S, Kobayashi Y, Kataoka T, et al. Quantification of coronary calcification by intravascular ultrasound[ J]. Circ J, 2007, 71 (4) : 530 - 535.
  • 9Abdel-Wahab M, Riehardt G, Joachim BUttner H, et al. High- Speed rotational atherectomy before paelitaxel-eluting stent implanta- tion in complex calcified coronary lesions, the randomized ROTAX- US (rotational atherectomy prior to taxus stent treatment for complex native coronary artery disease) trial [ J ]. J Am CoU Cardiol lntv ,2013, 6(1) :10 -19.
  • 10Khattab AA, Otto A, Hochadel M, et al. Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents following rotational atherectomy for heavily calcified coronary lesions: late angiographic and clinical follow-up results [J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2007, 20(2) :100 - 106.

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部