期刊文献+

应用德尔菲法研制新生儿科不良事件的筛查工具 被引量:4

Development of a neonatal department focused trigger tool using Delphi method to identify adverse events
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用德尔菲法研制适用于中国围产医疗系统新生儿科不良事件的筛查工具。方法2011年11月—2012年10月,我们采用德尔菲法,以美国健康促进研究院推荐的新生儿重症监护室不良事件筛查工具为框架,在5名新生儿领域医疗护理专家进行预调查的基础上形成专家咨询问卷。选取上海市15名专家进行2轮专家咨询,对筛查工具的条目进行筛选,并对识别工具的信度和效度进行初步测试。结果问卷有效回收率100%;专家权威系数均值为(0.90±0.09);2轮咨询后专家意见的协调系数(W)值分别为0.135和0.177;形成了共20个条目的新生儿科不良事件筛查工具。识别工具的Cronbach’s为0.815,CVI为0.956。结论借鉴德尔菲法研制的新生儿科不良事件筛查工具,具有较高的预测性和可靠性,对于新生儿科不良事件的识别具有现实意义。 Objective To develop a neonatal department focused trigger tool (NDTY) using Delphi method for adverse event detection. Methods From November 2011 to October 2012 Delphi method was adopted to design an expert consultation questionnaire based on the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) trigger tool recommended by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), literature review and interviews with five experts. Fifteen experts from Shanghai, Zhejiang Province and Sichuan Province were chosen to do a two-round Delphi consultation. The items were modified and the reliability and validity of NDTr were tested. Results The recovery rate of two-round questionnaire were 100%. The average authority coefficient (Cr) was (0.90 ± 0.09). The Kendall W in the first and second consultation was 0. 135 and 0.117, respectively (P 〈 0.001 ). The NDTT including 20 trigger items was formulated. The overall Cronbach's a was 0. 815, and content validity index (CVI) was 0.956. Conclusion The reliability of NDTr developed using Delphi method is relatively high. It remains to be further verified and improved in practice.
出处 《上海护理》 2013年第3期11-14,共4页 Shanghai Nursing
基金 上海市医院协会医院管理研究基金(编号:2011037)
关键词 新生儿科 不良事件 筛查工具 德尔菲法 Neonatal department Adverse event Trigger tool Delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kohn LT,Corrigan JM,Donaldson MS. To err is human:building a safer health system[M]. Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press.2000,1-6.
  • 2James Killingsworth.WHO全球患者安全联盟[J].中国医院,2005,9(12):2-3. 被引量:52
  • 3孟普.患者安全:国际化视角拯救危机的探索 医疗不良事件已成世界性问题[J].医院管理论坛,2007,24(11):28-30. 被引量:45
  • 4Resar RK, Rozich JD, Classen D. Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools [J]. Quality and Safety in Healthcare. 2003,12 (2):39-45.
  • 5Sharek PJ, Horbar JD, Mason W, et al. Adverse Events in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Development, Testing, and Findings of an NICU-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Harm in North American NICUs [J]. Pediatrics. 2006,118:1332-1340.
  • 6Williams PL. Webb C. The Delphi technique: a methodologic discussion[J]. J Adv Nur. 1994,19:180–186.
  • 7史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. 被引量:1194
  • 8曾光,李辉.现代流行病学方法与利用[M].北京:北京医科大学·协和医科大学联合出版社,1996:250-270.
  • 9中华人民共和国卫士部. 病历书写基本规范. 卫医政发(2010)11号.
  • 10程琮,刘一志,王如德.Kendall协调系数W检验及其SPSS实现[J].泰山医学院学报,2010,31(7):487-490. 被引量:216

二级参考文献22

  • 1李海燕,许增禄,张虎林,胡世平,黎彬,任慧玲,栗文靖.中美突发传染病事件应急系统对比分析[J].中华医院管理杂志,2005,21(5):353-356. 被引量:14
  • 2张国荣,陈文光,蒋景华,章泽豹,陶映.医院突发公共卫生事件与传染病报告信息系统应用[J].中华医院管理杂志,2005,21(6):409-411. 被引量:9
  • 3Wayne W Daniel.Applied nonparametric statistics[J].2th edition.Boston:PWS-KENT Punlishing Company,1990:386-391.
  • 4程琮.SPSS统计分析教程[M].北京:现代教育出版社,2009.
  • 5Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 6Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 7Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 8Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 9Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 10Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.

共引文献1728

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部