摘要
目的对经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(PKRP)与经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗前列腺增生症(BPH)的临床疗效进行比较。方法将450例患者分为PKRP与TURP组,TUPKVP组采用Gyrus经尿道等离子双极电切系统;TURP组采用Wolf连续冲洗式电切镜。结果 TUPKVP组190例(95%)、TURP组有235例(93.9%)术后3mo取得随访,QOL,IPSS,Qmax及RU都较术前发生明显改善。结论 TURP和BPH均为治疗BPH的有效方法,经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术具有安全性高、对机体生理功能影响小的优点,且治疗BPH的适应证范围相对较广。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）by transurethral bipolar plasma resection （PKRP）the transurethral prostate transurethral prostate （TURP）. Methods 450 patients divided into PKRP with TURP group TUPKVP group using Gyrus urethra plasma bipolar electrosurgical excision system; TURP group Wolf continuous flushing resectoscope.Resnlts TUPKVP group of 190 cases （95%）the TURP group of 235 patients （93.9%）postoperative 3mo obtain follow-up, QOL, IPSS, Q max and RU obvious improvement compared with the preoperative. Conclusion Effective method for the treatment of BPH the TURP and BPH are the prostatic urethra plasma bipolar resection with high safety, small advantage of the physiological function of the body, and a relatively wide range of indications for the treatment of BPH.
出处
《中国卫生产业》
2013年第11期31-31,33,共2页
China Health Industry
关键词
前列腺增生
前列腺等离子
双极电切术
疗效比较
Prostatic hyperplasia
Prostate plasma
Bipolar transurethral resection
Efficacy comparison
