期刊文献+

锁定型钢板治疗老年人肱骨近端骨折疗效分析 被引量:8

Clinical effects of locking proximal humerus plate for humeral proximal fractures in elderly patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨锁定型钢板固定治疗老年人肱骨近端骨折的临床治疗效果。方法回顾性分析我院骨科老年肱骨近端骨折患者84例临床资料,随机分为观察组42例和对照组42例。观察组患者经切开复位采用锁定型钢板固定治疗,对照组患者切开复位采用克氏针治疗,随访1年,对两组患者治疗效果进行评价。结果观察组患者术中出血量为(189.2±27.5)ml,术后愈合时间为(102.3±6.2)d;对照组患者术中出血量为(177.6±28.2)ml,术后愈合时间为(99.9士6.8)d,差异无统计学意义(t=1.78、1.33,P-0.079、0.105)。患者出院后随访1年,观察组42例患者优22例(52.4%)、良18例(42.9%)、差2例(4.8%),优良率95.2%;对照组患者优15例(35.7%)、良22例(52.4%)、差5例(11.9%),优良率88.1%,观察组优良率高于对照组(X^2=3.18,P=0.028)。结论锁定型钢板固定治疗老年人肱骨近端骨折临床治疗效果较好,肩关节功能恢复良好。 Objective To discuss the clinical effects of locking proximal humerus plate (LPHP) for humeral proximal fractures in elderly patients. Methods A total of 84 elderly patients with humeral proximal fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into LPHP group and control group (n= 42, each group). Patients in I.PHP group were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using LPHP. Patients in control group were treated with open reduction and Kirschner wire fixation. All patients were followed up for 1 year and the shoulder joint function was evaluated. Results There were no significant differences in bleeding volume and the wound healing time between LPHP group and control group [(189.2 ± 27.5) ml vs. (177.6± 28.2) ml, (102.3±6.2) days v.. (99.9±6.8) days, t=1.78, 1.33, P 0.079, 0.105, respectively]. One year after the follow up, there were 22 cases (52.4± 22/42) with excellent clinical evaluation, 18 cases (42.9% 18/42) with good clinical evaluation and 2 cases (4.8% 2/42) with poor clinical evaluation in LPHP group, and 15 cases (35.7% 15/42) with excellent clinical evaluation, 22 cases (52.4%, 22/42) with good clinical evaluation, and 5 cases (11.9% 5/42) with poor clinical evaluation in control group. There was a significant difference in the evaluation rate of excellent and good clinical efficacy between in LPHP group and in control group (95.2% vs. 88.1%, X^2 =3.18, P=0. 028). Conclusions The internal fixation using LPHP has a good clinical effect in elderly patients with humeral proximal fractures, and it can well improve the recovery of shoulder joint function.
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期524-525,共2页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
关键词 肱骨骨折 肩关节 骨折固定术 Humeral fractures Shoulder joint Fracture fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1王群波,蒋电明,李智,何秦,张东,欧双权,王晓林,庾明,王玉川,黄炎星.人工肱骨头置换治疗肱骨近端复杂骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(3):175-178. 被引量:17
  • 2钱齐荣,吴海山,周维江,李晓华,吴宇黎,柴伟.人工肩关节置换术肩袖功能的重建[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(4):277-279. 被引量:15
  • 3Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: Part I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg, 1970,52 : 1077-1130.
  • 4Konrad G, Bayer J, Hepp D, et aL upen leuu and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg, 2010, 92: 85-95.
  • 5Helmy N, Hintermann B. New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006,442 : 100-108.
  • 6Lee CK, Hansen HR. Post-traumatic avaseular necrosis of the humeral head in displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Trauma,1981,21:788-791.
  • 7WijgmanAJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg, 2002,84 : 1919-1925.
  • 8Bjorkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand,2004,75:741-745.
  • 9Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G,et al. A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. ClinOrthop Relat Res,2005,430:176-181.
  • 10Gardner MJ, Well Y, Barker JU, et al. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2007,21:185-191.

共引文献67

同被引文献84

  • 1胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:708-719.
  • 2Robinson CM, Wylie JR, Ray AG, et al. Proximal humeral fractures with asevere varus deformity treated by fixation with a locking plate [ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2010,92(5) : 672 - 678.
  • 3Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, et al. Rate of proximal hu- meral fractures in older finnish women between 1970 and 2007 [ J ]. Bone,2009,44:656 - 659.
  • 4Mutch J, Laflamme GY, Hagemeister N, et al. A new morphological classification for greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: validation and clinical Implications [ J ]. Bone Joint J, 2014,96 ( 5 ) : 646 -651.
  • 5Chowdary U, Prasad H, Subramanyam PK, et al. Outcome of locking compression plating for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study[ J]. J Orthop Surg( Hong Kong), 2014,22( 1 ) :4-8.
  • 6Benegas E, Ferreira Neto AA, Gracitelli ME, et al. Shoulder function after surgical treatment of displaced fractures of the humeral shaft: a randomized trial comparing antegrade intramedullary nailing with mini- mally invasive plate osteosynthesis [ J 1. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2014, 23(14) : 120-127.
  • 7Moon JG, Kwon EIN, Birar/s S, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosyn- thesis using a helical plate for metadiaphyseal complex fractures of the proximal humerus I J. Orthopedics,2014,37 () :237-243.
  • 8Huang YG, Chang SM. Double crush syndrome due to plating of hu- meral shaft fracture[J]. Indian J Orthop,2014,48(2) :223-225.
  • 9Chowdary U,Prasad H,Subramanyam PK,et al.Outcome of locking compression plating forproximal humeral fractures:a prospective study[J].J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong),2014,22(1):4-8.
  • 10Neer CS 2nd.Displaced proximal humeral fractures.I.Classification and evaluation[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1970,52(11):1077-1089.

引证文献8

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部