期刊文献+

The Impact of International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)'s Guidelines for Preparing Management Commentary (MC): Evidence From Italian Listed Firms 被引量:1

The Impact of International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)'s Guidelines for Preparing Management Commentary (MC): Evidence From Italian Listed Firms
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper investigates the Italian firms' disclosure in response to the new guidance on the management commentary (MC) contained in the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) practice statement issued by International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in 2010. The study is organized as follows. After reviewing the relevant literature on financial disclosure and MC, this paper examines the content of the Italian management's report-----known as "Relazione sulla Gestione" and that of the recent IASB's IFRS practice statement. Hence, it applies a self-constructed disclosure index and a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) on MC of a sample of 66 Italian non-financial listed firms. The results show that the level of disclosures provided by the Italian listed firms does not seem to be affected by the IASB's guidelines. However, the survey highlights large differences in the level and type of disclosure provided in MC among the sectors and firms. This paper aims to contribute to the financial reporting debate by understanding the IASB's guidelines and their impacts on the voluntary disclosure practices of Italian listed firms.
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2013年第3期305-320,共16页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Aljifri, K. (2008). Annual report disclosure in a developing country: The case of the UAE. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 24( 1 ), 93-100.
  • 2American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICPA] (1994). Improving business reporting. A customer focus. New York.
  • 3Barron, O. E., & Kile, C. O. (1999). MD&A quality as measured by the SEC and analysts' earnings forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 75-109.
  • 4Beattie, V., Mclnnes, W., & Fearnley, S. (2004). A methodology for analyzing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205-236.
  • 5Beattie, V., Mclnnes, W., & Pierpoint, J. (2008). The management commentary: Comparing narrative outcomes from alternative regulatory regimes. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London.
  • 6Benzecri, J. P. (1973). The data analysis. Volume I: Taxonomy. Volume 2." Analysis of correspondence. Paris: Dunod.
  • 7Benzecri, J. P. (1979). Calculation of the inertia ratio in the analysis of a questionnaire. Journal of Data Analysis, 4, 377-378.
  • 8Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2008). Quantity vs. quality: The case of forward-looking disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 23(3), 333-375.
  • 9Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323-350.
  • 10Bryan, S. H. (1997). Incremental information content of required disclosures contained in management discussion and analysis. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 285-301.

同被引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部