期刊文献+

脑干听觉诱发电位与体感诱发电位在急性脑梗死患者预后评价中的意义 被引量:5

Significance of brain stem auditory evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential on prognosis evaluation in patients with acute cerebral infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究急性脑梗死患者脑干听觉诱发电位(brain stem auditory evoked potential,BAEP)和体感诱发电位(somatosensory evoked potential,SEP)的改变及其临床意义,并对患者的预后进行评价。方法选择60例急性脑梗死患者作为脑梗死组,连续检测并记录每例患者BAEP和SEP的改变情况。同时按GCS评分评价患者的预后情况。按照年龄和性别配对选择60例健康人作为对照。结果脑梗死组BAEPI波潜伏期与对照组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但其他波及峰间期与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。脑梗死组SEP表现为P14-N60各波均明显延长(P〈0.05)。结论BAEP和SEP能较好地反映患者脑干的功能状态,对急性脑梗死患者的预后评价具有一定的意义。 Objective To investigate changes of brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in patients with acute cerebral infarction, and discuss their relation with prognosis of the patients. Methods The study involved 60 patients with acute cerebral infarction. Changes of BAEP and SEP in each patient were detected and recorded continuously. Prognosis evaluation was performed by using GCS. Another 60 age-matched and gender-matched healthy human beings were enrolled as controls. Results Incubation period of BAEP wave I had no significant difference between the cerebral infarction and control groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). However, interspike intervals of other BAEP waves in cerebral infarction group were different from those in control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). A series of waves of SEP (P14-N60) were all significantly prolonged in cerebral infarction group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion BAEP and SEP can effectively reflect function of brain stem in patients with acute cerebral infarction and have some values in determining their prognosis.
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期451-453,共3页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
关键词 脑损伤 诱发电位 听觉 诱发电位 躯体感觉 急性脑梗死 Brain injuries Evoked potential, auditory Evoked potential, somatosensory Acute cerebral infarction
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1杨志刚,于明琨.影响重型颅脑损伤患者功能预后的主要因素[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(25):162-164. 被引量:9
  • 2赵江佩,黄华品.诱发电位判断昏迷患者预后的评价[J].医学综述,2006,12(3):186-188. 被引量:6
  • 3中华神经科学会 中华神经外科学会.脑血管疾病分类(1995)[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(3):233-235.
  • 4Soustiel JF, Hafner H,Guiburd JN, et al. A physiological coma scale: grading of coma by combined use of brain stem trigeminal and auditory evoked potentials and the Glasgow coma Scale [J]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1993,87(5) : 277-283.
  • 5Ganes T, Lundar T. EEG and evoked potentials in comatose patients with severe brain damage[J]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1988,69 : 6-13.
  • 6Guerit JM. Evoked potentials in severe brain injury[J]. Prog Brain Res,2005,150: 415-426.
  • 7L. Rabow,D. Cook,M. H. Lipper,A. A. F. DeSalles,H. D. Gruemer,A. Marmarou,D. P. Becker. Relationship between CT attenuation changes and post-traumatic CSF-CKBB-activity after severe head injury in man[J] 1989,Acta Neurochirurgica(3-4):155~157
  • 8A. Niedeggen,D. Adelt,R. Berndt,Th Hopf. Creatine-Kinase-BB after severe head-injury as an index of prognosis in relation to nature of trauma and patients age[J] 1989,Acta Neurochirurgica(3-4):117~120
  • 9J. D. Miller. ICP monitoring—Current status and future directions[J] 1987,Acta Neurochirurgica(3-4):80~86
  • 10费智敏,徐纪文,王勇,罗其中,金萍茜,邱永明,李善泉.短潜时体感诱发电位对重度颅脑外伤术后昏迷病人的预后评估[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1998,24(1):17-19. 被引量:9

共引文献20

同被引文献51

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部