期刊文献+

葛根芩连丸治疗成人急性感染性腹泻的研究 被引量:6

Prospective randomized controlled trial of gegenqinlian pill versus antibiotics among adult acute infectious diarrhea
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的研究中成药葛根芩连丸治疗成人急性感染性腹泻的临床疗效。方法选取我院肠道门诊2009年6月~2010年8月确诊急性感染性腹泻患者200例,随机分为抗生素组(对照组)和葛根组(治疗组),将两组疗效及治疗花费进行比较。结果两组患者人口学特征与基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性;治疗前后全身症状、脱水情况及腹部症状评分改变两组比较,均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);疗效显效率治疗组87%,对照组91%;两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组花费治疗组平均为86.25元,对照组为100.10元,二者比较差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论葛根芩连丸治疗成人急性感染性腹泻有效,而且价格便宜。 Objective To examine the clinical curative effect of Chinese patent medicine gegenqinlian pill in patients with acute infectious diarrhea. Methods Two hundred adult patients were recruited from diarrhea out-patient clinic in our hospital from June 2009 to August 2010.Equal number of patients were randomized to antibiotic group(control group n=100)or gegen group (therapeutic group n=100). Data of clinical symptoms were collected in clinic and during 7-day follow-up.Cost of therapy was compared between two groups. Results The demographic characters and cinical symptom have no significant difference between two groups(P〉0.05).The scores of symptoms and signs,such as deferveseence, stomachache, diarrhea and tenesmus,ha^e no significant difference between two groups(P〉0.05).Total effective rate of two group is 87% and 91%,respectively.The cost of control group was much more than that of gegen group(P〈0.01). Conclusion Gegenqinlian pill is a valid and ralative cheaper medicine.
出处 《湖南中医药大学学报》 CAS 2013年第4期22-23,共2页 Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
关键词 葛根芩连丸 感染性腹泻 随机对照研究 Gegenqinlian pill Infectious diarrhea Randomized control study
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1中国腹泻病诊断治疗方案[J].临床儿科杂志,1994,12(3):148-151. 被引量:456
  • 2Holliday M. The evolution of therapy for dehydration: should deficit therapy still be taught? Pediatrics, 1996, 98 : 171-177.
  • 3Gavin N, Merrik N, Davidson B. Efficacy of glucose-based oral rehydration therapy. Pediatrics, 1996, 98:45-51.
  • 4Finberg L. The role of oral electrolyte-glucose solutions in hydration for children-international and domestic aspects. J Pediatr, 1980, 96:51-54.
  • 5Rautanen T, El-Radhi S, Vesikari T. Clinical experience with a hypotonic oral rehydration solution in acute diarrhoea. Acta Paediatr, 1993, 82:52-54.
  • 6Mahalanabis D, Faruque AS, Hoque SS, et al. Hypotonic oral rehydration solution in acute diarrhoea: a controlled clinical trial.Acta Paediat, 1995, 84:289-293.
  • 7Rautanen T, Kurki S, Vesikari T. Randomized double blind study of hypotonic oral rehydration solution in diarrhea. Arch Dis Child,1997, 76: 272-274.
  • 8Choice Study Group. Multicentre, randomized, double blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhoea. Pediatrics, 2001, 107: 613-618.
  • 9Santosham M, Fayad I, Abu Zikri M, et al. Double-blind clinical trial eomparing WHO-ORS with a redueed osmolarity solution eontaining equal amounts of sodium and glueose. J Pediatr, 996,128:45-51.
  • 10King CK, Glass R, Bresee JS, et al. Managing acute gastroenteritis among children : Oral rehydration, maintenance,and nutritional therapy. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2003, 52(16) :1-16.

共引文献12

同被引文献86

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部