期刊文献+

Family Firms and the Market Reaction to Dividend News

Family Firms and the Market Reaction to Dividend News
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper provides an analysis of the market reaction to dividend change announcements for publicly-traded, family-controlled firms. Family firms have a significantly lower proportion of independent directors than non-family firms, which is consistent with the idea that family members dominate the board of directors and that family shareholders are common in publicly-traded firms. The author analyzed 390 dividend change announcements in Portugal over the period from 1991 to 2010 using a panel data approach. The results show no evidence of a significant market reaction to dividend change announcements, providing no evidence in support of the dividend-signaling hypothesis in the context of family firms. This conclusion agrees with previous studies in which there was no distinction between family and non-family firms. Empirical results show that family firms engage in lower payouts than their non-family counterparts, giving some supports to the expropriation hypothesis. This finding may indicate that families expropriate the wealth of shareholders through lower dividends. This result is also consistent with the clientele theory of dividends.
机构地区 Aveiro University
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2013年第4期527-541,共15页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 family firms cash dividends signaling hypothesis market reaction 家族企业 市场反应 新闻 公告 董事会 葡萄牙 股东 证据
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Abeyratna, G., & Power, D. (2002). The post-announcement performance of dividend-changing companies: The dividend-signaling hypothesis revisited. Accounting and Finance, 42, 131-151.
  • 2Ahmad, H., & Javid, A. (2009). Dynamics and determinants of dividend policy in Pakistan: Evidence from Karachi stock exchange non-financial listed firms. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 25, 148-171.
  • 3Ali, M. B., & Chowdhury, T. A. (2010). Effect of dividend on stock price in emerging stock market: A study on the listed private commercial banks in DSE. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(4), 52-64.
  • 4Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
  • 5Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209-237.
  • 6Archbold, S., & Vieira, E. (2010). Corporate dividend policies in bank-based and market-based systems: Survey evidence from UK and Portugal. Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, 15(1 ), 35-63.
  • 7Asamoah, G. N. (2010). The impact of dividend announcement on share price behavior in Ghana. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 8(4), 47-58.
  • 8Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1997). Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics? Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3), 341-372.
  • 9Benartzi, S., Michaely, R., & Thaler, R. (1997). Do changes in dividends signal the future or the past? Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1007-1034.
  • 10Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and "the bird in the hand fallacy". Bell Joztrnal of Economics, 10(1), 259-270.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部