期刊文献+

专利质量表征及其有效性:中国机械工具类专利案例研究 被引量:23

Indicators for patent quality and their effectiveness:A case study on machine tools patents issued by SIPO
原文传递
导出
摘要 在全球专利膨胀的大背景下,有效的早期专利评价指标是把握技术发展态势服务战略和技术管理的有力工具。本文以中国专利局1986-2005年间授权的机械工具领域发明专利为研究对象,以专利文献中早期可获得的经济或技术信息为基础构建出专利质量早期表征指标,选择专利维持时间作为专利质量的代理变量,建立生存分析模型,利用SPSS统计软件研究了这些早期指标表征专利质量的有效性。研究表明,该技术领域中权利要求项数的增加能够降低国内专利生存危险,专利说明书页数和发明人数的增加能够降低国外专利生存风险,对应专利组的平均专利质量也相对高。结果说明,权利要求项数、说明书页数、发明人数等早期文献指标能够不同程度地表征专利质量。本研究结果、思路及方法对探索和确定早期专利评价指标特别是适合中国专利数据的指标具有启发性,也为从广义虚拟经济的角度研究专利资产价值提供参考。 Against the background of explosive expansion of patent quantity worldwide, the effective evaluation indicators at the early stage of patents serve as a powerful tool for mastering the technology development trend, service strategy, and technological management. Taking machine tool patents issued by State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of China during the period of 1986 - 2005 as a research object, early stage indicators are constructed based on the economic or technical information obtained in the early patent bibliography, and the patent renewal duration is selected as the proxy variable of the patent quality. How effective the patent quality characterized by these indicators is studied with the aid of the statistical software of SPSS and Cox survival analysis modeling. It is found that the increase of claim number is able to reduce the survival risk of internal patents, meanwhile the in- crease of both specification pages and inventors is able to reduce the survival risk of external patents, and the average patent qual- ity for corresponding group is relatively higher. It is further indicated that the number of patent claims, patent specification pa- ges, and inventors are able to reflect patent quality with the different degrees. The results and approaches of the study enlighten on the exploration and determination of early stage patent evaluation indicators, and these indicators are especially suitable to the SIPO data, and provide the reference for the study of patent asset value in the view of generalized fictitious economics.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期93-101,共9页 Science Research Management
基金 国防科工委技术基础项目(22060303) 国家自然科学基金项目(71173008) 广义虚拟经济项目(GX2011-1004(Y))
关键词 专利质量 专利文献信息 评价指标 有效性 patent quality patent bibliometrics evaluation indicator effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Griliches,Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey [ J ]. Journal of Eeonomie Literature, 1990 ( 28 ) : 1661 -.
  • 2Pakes, A. and Sehankerman, M. The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources [ A ]. Griliehcs, Z. R&D, Patents and Productivity [ C]. The University of Chicago Press, 1984:73 - 88. [ EB/OL] http://www, nber. org/chapters>el0045. pdf.
  • 3Schankerman, M. and Pakes, A. Estimates of the value of pa- tent rights in European countries during the post 1950 period [ J]. Economic Journal, 1986 : 1052 - 1076.
  • 4Duguet, E. and Lung, N. R&D Investment, Patent Life and Patent Value[ R] , 1997, Working paper No. G9705, Institut National de la Statistique et des etudes Economiques, Malakoff Cedex.
  • 5Scherer, M. The size distribution of profit from innovation [ J], Annals of Economics and Statistics, 1998 (49/50) :495 -615.
  • 6Richard, J. S. Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in Brit- ain and Ireland[J]. Economic,1994(61 ) : 37 -58.
  • 7Carpenter, M. Narin, F. and Woolf, P. Citation rates to the technological important patents [ J ]. World Patent Informa- tion,1981 (3 -4) :160 - 163.
  • 8Narin, F. Patent bilbiometrics [ J ]. Scientometrics, 1994 ( 30 ) : 47 - 155.
  • 9Albert,M. B. , Avery,D. , Narin,F. and McAlllster, P. Di- rect Validation and Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrial- ly Important Patents [ J ]. Research Policy, 1991,20 ( 3 ) : 251 - 259.
  • 10Harhoff, D. , Narin,F. , Scherer,F. and Vopel,K. Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions [ J ]. The Re- view of Economics and Statistics, 1999 ( 81 ) :511 - 515.

二级参考文献58

  • 1黄庆,曹津燕,瞿卫军,刘洋,石昱,肖云鹏.专利评价指标体系(一)——专利评价指标体系的设计和构建[J].知识产权,2004,14(5):25-28. 被引量:123
  • 2魏雪君.用科学发展观构建新的专利评价指标体系[J].科技管理研究,2006,26(7):171-173. 被引量:20
  • 3李清海,刘洋,吴泗宗,许晓冰.专利价值评价指标概述及层次分析[J].科学学研究,2007,25(2):281-286. 被引量:95
  • 4Jaffe A B. The US patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. Research Policy, 2000, 29 (4 - 5 ) : 531 - 557.
  • 5O' Donoghue T, Scotchmer S, Thisse J F. Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1998, 7 (1) : 1 - 32.
  • 6WIPO Patent Report: Statistics on Worldwide Patent Activity (2007 Edition). [ 2008 - 08 - 10 ]. http ://www. wipo. int/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/patent_report_2007.html#P757_42609 2007 - 8 - 11.
  • 7Markman G D, Espina M I, Phan P H. Patents as Surrogates for Inimitable and Non-Substitutable Resources. Journal of Management, 2004,30 (4) :529 -544.
  • 8Abraham B P, Moitra S D. Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 2001,21 (4) :245 -252.
  • 9Paci R, Sassu A. International patents and national technological specialization. Technovation, 1997, 17(1):25-38.
  • 10Tong, Frame J D. Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 1995,23 (2) :133 -141.

共引文献283

同被引文献334

引证文献23

二级引证文献286

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部