摘要
在保护地种植中果型西瓜京欣,采用双行坐果种植方式、单行坐果种植方式与传统随机坐果种植方式进行比较,结果表明:在保护地种植中果型西瓜667m2产量及中心、边部可溶性固形物含量、商品瓜率与坐果方式及管理方法有关,双行坐果种植方式西瓜坐瓜率达到99%,单瓜质量达到5.7kg,中心和边部可溶性固形物含量达到11.03%和7.43%,分别比传统随机坐果种植方式提高0.73和0.36百分点,且口感好,667m2产量达到3893.67kg,经济效益比传统随机坐果种植方式提高33.01%。单行坐果种植方式由于密度较大,坐果后受根系吸收养分及水分的不利影响较大,坐果率为98.07%,单瓜质量为4.84kg,中心和边部可溶性固形物含量为10.87%和7.10%,667m2产量为3296.19kg,经济效益比传统随机坐果种植方式提高10.34%。传统随机坐果种植方式各项指标最低:坐果率为97.3%,单瓜质量为4.63kg,中心和边部可性固形物含量为10.3%和7.07%,667m2产量为3085.29kg,经济效益为6851.75元。建议瓜农改变传统的随机坐果种植方式为双行坐果方式种植。
The double row fruit setting and single row fruit setting patterns were compared to traditional random fruit setting cultivation for cuhivar Jingxin No.3 in plastic house in Beijing. The double row fruit setting pattern reached fruit setting of 99%, average fruit weight 5.7 kg, soluble solid content at center 11.03% and near rind 7.43%, and yield on 667 m2 3 893.67 kg. The profit of double row fruit setting pattern was 33.01% higher than that of traditional random fruit setting. The single row fruit setting pattern reached fruit set of 98.07%, average fruit weight of 4.84 kg, soluble solid content at center 10.87% and near rind 7.10%. The yield on 667 m2 was 3 296.19 kg,and the profit was 10.34% higher than control. The fruit set on control was 97.3% ,average fruit weight was 4.63 kg,soluble solid content at center was 10.3% and 7.07% near rind. The yield on 667 m2 was 3 085.29 kg,with an income of 6 851.75 yuan per 667 m2. Growers should change their traditional random fruit setting pattern.
出处
《中国瓜菜》
CAS
2013年第3期20-22,共3页
China Cucurbits And Vegetables
关键词
中果型西瓜
坐果方式
品质
产量
Median-size watermelon
Fruit setting
Quality
Production
