期刊文献+

两种手术方式治疗妇科疾病的临床效果观察 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察比较腹腔镜手术和常规开腹手术治疗妇科疾病的临床效果。方法:将90例需手术治疗的妇科疾病患者随机分为治疗组及对照组,对照组采用常规开腹手术,治疗组采用腹腔镜手术,观察两组的手术时间、术中平均出血量、术后镇痛药使用率、肛门首次排气时间、住院时间及手术并发症。结果:两组手术时间、术后镇痛药使用率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗组平均出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组手术并发症明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与常规开腹手术比较,妇科疾病采用腹腔镜手术的创伤小、术后恢复快、住院时间短,为妇科疾病的治疗提供了一种可选择的好方法。
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第15期2476-2477,共2页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献33

  • 1边爱平,赵倩.两种腹腔镜子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术的临床效果分析[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2005,19(8):555-557. 被引量:31
  • 2刘彦.腹腔镜子宫切除的临床适应证选择和应用[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(6):331-333. 被引量:57
  • 3吴霞,张建萍,卢丹,舒明炎.妇科腹腔镜手术并发症相关因素的分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(2):91-93. 被引量:50
  • 4WANG P H,LEE W L,YUAN C C,et al.Major complications of operative and diagnostic laparoscopy for gynecologic disease[J].J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc,2001,8 (1):68-73.
  • 5BOIKE G M,ELFSTRAND E P,DELPRIORE G,et al.Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital;report of 82 cases and comparison with abdminal and vaginal hysterectomy[J].Am J Obster Gymecol,1993,168(1):16.
  • 6Leonard F, Lecuru F, Rizk E, et al. Perioperative morbidity of gynecological laparoscopy. A prospective monocenter observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2000,79:129-134.
  • 7Maresh MJ, Metcalfe MA, McPherson K, et al. The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery. BJOG, 2002,109:302-312.
  • 8Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, et al. Mechanism, management, and prevention of laparoscopic bowel injuries. Gastrointest Endosc, 1996,43:572-574.
  • 9Milad MP, Sokol E. Laparoscopic morcellator-related injuries. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2003,10:383-385.
  • 10Huang KG, Wang CJ, Chang TC, et al. Management of port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003,189:16-21.

共引文献164

同被引文献9

  • 1BOGANI G, CROMI A, SERATI M, et al. Laparoscopic and open abdominal staging for early-stage ovarian cancer: our experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis of comparative studies[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2014, 24(7): 1241-1249.
  • 2UCCELLA S, LATERZA R, CIRAVOLO G, et al. A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 107(1 Suppl 1): S147-S149.
  • 3CHANG C C, CHEN W. A comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open myomectomy in Southern Taiwan[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2012, 119(2): 189-193.
  • 4BARAKAT E E, BEDAIWY M A, ZIMBERG S, et al. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 117(2 Pt 1): 256-265.
  • 5BOGANI G, CROMI A, UCCELLA S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(5): 857-862.
  • 6孔双,马生秀.妇科腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术的比较研究[J].青海医学院学报,2010,31(1):59-62. 被引量:17
  • 7李玉仙.妇科腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术的对比分析[J].中国实用医药,2011,6(27):111-112. 被引量:7
  • 8童琳.妇科腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术的比较研究[J].临床医学工程,2012,19(12):2148-2149. 被引量:2
  • 9陈宜斌.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗妇科疾病的疗效分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2013,18(3):235-237. 被引量:11

引证文献2

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部