摘要
《老子》和《纯粹理性评判》分别从感性认识和纯粹知性认识角度描述它们的"道"和"自在之物"。康德坚执现象与"自在之物"的根本区别,走向了二元论;《老子》借助生存哲学走向了"道"与万物的混沌统一。实践唯物主义,一方面,肯定生活实践改变世界、创造历史的伟大作用,另方面,也充分肯定在一定意义上认识活动具有相对的自在性、独立性价值,主张保持实践活动与认识活动必要的距离、张力。
＂Laozi＂ and ＂Pure rational judgment＂ separately describe ＂Tao＂ and ＂thing - in - itself＂ from the per- ceptual knowledge and pure intellectual cognition perspective. Kant insists on the fundamental difference between the phenomenon and the ＂thing -in -itself ＂, to dualism; ＂ Laozi＂ is towards the unified of ＂Tao＂ and all the chaos with the help of survival philosophy; all show certain historical limitations. Practical materialism, one side, affirm the great role of life practice changing the world, creating the history ; On the other hand, affirms that the un- derstanding activity is relatively free, independent value, requiring to maintain the necessary distance, tension of the practice activity and understanding activity.
关键词
道
自在之物
张力
Tao
thing- in- itself
tension
