基于预处理技术的扰动风对多段翼型非定常绕流作用的数值模拟被引量：1

Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Gust over Multi-element Airfoil Using Preconditioning Method

下载PDF

导出

摘要运用双时间推进法和动态嵌套网格技术对扰动风作用下的多段翼型非定常绕流进行了数值模拟.首先,结合预处理技术对麻省理工学院(Massachusetts Institude of Technology,MIT)的翼型模型在扰动风作用下的流动进行数值模拟,并运用其实验结果验证程序的正确性;然后,对多段翼型在周期性的扰动风作用下的非定常粘性绕流进行数值模拟,得到非定常情况下气动力随扰动风变化的迟滞规律.计算范围内的结果表明:扰动风的频率越低,幅度越大,多段翼型整体上的气动力越大;扰动风的频率越高,幅值越大,对多段翼型的气动力影响越大. Dual-time step method and moving overset grid method are applied to simulate the multi-element airfoil. First, combined with preconditioning method, the flapping foil experiment of MIT （Massachusetts Institude of Technology） is simulated to validated the numerical method. A multi-element foil under the effect of gusts is simulated to give the disciplines of the aerodynamic forces changing with the phases of gusts. Simulated results shows that, the lower the frequency and the larger the amplitude of the gust, the larger the aerodynamic forces on the multi-element airfoils. On the other hand, the higher the frequency and the larger the amplitude of the gust, the more intense the gust will affect the aerodynamic forces on the multi-element airfoils.

作者张海军李孝伟

机构地区上海大学上海市应用数学和力学研究所

出处《上海大学学报（自然科学版）》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期191-196,共6页 Journal of Shanghai University:Natural Science Edition

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(10672097 10772103)

关键词多段翼型扰动风预处理技术动态嵌套网格双时间推进算法 multi-element airfoil gust wind preconditioning method dynamic overset grid dual-time stepmethod

分类号 V211.3 [航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1MILES J W. The aerodynamic force on an airfoil in a moving gust [J]. Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, 1956, 23(11): 1044-1050.
2PARAMESWARAN V, BAEDER J D. Indicial aero- dynamics in compressible flow-direct computational fluid dynamic calculations [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1997, 34(1): 131-133.
3杨国伟,王济康.CFD结合降阶模型预测阵风响应[J].力学学报,2008,40(2):145-153. 被引量：14
4COLIN Y. A robust low speed preconditioning formu- lation for viscous flow computations [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2011, 47(1): 1-15.
5TURKEL E, VATSA V N, RADESPIEL R. Precondi- tioning methods for lows-speed flows[C]// 14th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. 1996: 1-12.
6PUOTI V. Preconditioning methods for low-speed flow [J]. AIAA J, 2003, 41(5): 817-830.
7TURKEL E. Robust low speed preconditioning for viscous high lift flows [C]// 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 2002: 1-5.
8JAMESON A, YOON S. Multi-grid solution of the Euler equations using implicit schemes [J]. AIAA J, 1986, 24(1): 1737-1743.
9NEEL R E. Advances in computational fluid dyna- mics: turbulent separated flows and transoinc potential flows [D]. Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1997: 87-120.
10WENTZ W H. Wind tunnel tests of the GA(W)- 2 airfoil with 20% Aileron, 25% slotted flap, 30% fowler flap, and 10% slot-lip spoiler [R]. Moffett Field: NASA, 1977.

二级参考文献6

1Bisplinhoff RL, Ashley H, Halfman RL. Aeroelasticity. New York: Dover, 1996.
2Mazelsky B, Drischler JA. Numerical determination of indicial lift and moment functions for two- dimensional sinking and pitching airfoil at mach number of 0.5 and 0.6. NACATN 2793, 1952.
3Yang G, Obayashi S. Numerical analyses of discrete gust response for an aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(6): 1353-1359.
4Thomas JP, Dowell EH, Hall KC. Three-dimensional tran- sonic aeroelasticity using proper orthogonal decomposition- based reduced-order models. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(3): 544-551.
5Cowan T J, Andrew SAJ, Gupta KK. Accelerating computational fluid dynamics based aeroelastic predictions using system identification. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 38(1): 81-87.
6Thomas J, Hall KP, Dowell EH. A harmonic balance approach for modeling nonlinear aeroelastic behavior of wings in transonic viscous flow. AIAA paper 2003-1924, 2003.