摘要
本文探讨了刊登在《北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第3期上的《美国学界蒙元史研究模式及文献举隅》一文的若干纰漏。海内外史学界研究蒙元史的切入角度有三:中国史角度,蒙古史与蒙古帝国史角度,中西交通史角度。美国、德国、法国、日本、韩国和澳大利亚等国的学者在蒙元史文献的翻译和研究上取得了大量成果。中国学者李思纯、韩儒林、陈得芝、李治安和王晓欣等人都阐述了蒙元史研究的方法与途径。
This paper discusses some problems in Research Models and Literature Examples of Mongolian History in the Yuan Dynasty in the U.S. Academic Circle, which is published in the Journal of Beifang University of Na- tionalities （No.3, 2012）. Scholars, in and outside China, study the history of Yuan Dynasty from three angles. The history of Yuan Dynasty is regarded as a part of Chinese history, a part of Mongolia and the Mongol Empire histo- ry, and a part of the history of Sino-foreign communications. Academics of United States, Germany, France, Japan, Korea and Australia have made great achievements in the translation and research about the Yuan dynasty histori- cal literature. Chinese scholars, such as Li Sichun, Han Rulin, Chen Dezhi, Li Zhian and Wang Xiaoxin, expound- ed the approaches to the research on the history of Yuan Dynasty.
出处
《西北民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期151-161,共11页
Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies
关键词
蒙元史
成果
方法
history of Yuan Dynasty
achievements
approaches
