摘要
知识确证是认识论的一大难题。在这个问题上历来存在着语境论与非语境论如怀疑论、常识实在论、可错论、比较论、不变论和相对主义的长期争论。语境论主张知识在特定语境中是意义明确的,怀疑论则持相反的观点,常识实在论认为常识直觉就可驳倒怀疑论,比较论认为知识是通过命题比较来阐明的,不变论认为知识不随语境变化的,相对主义强调知识语句是在语境中被评价的,而不是在语境中被说出的。这些非语境论各自提出了对知识确证问题的解决策略。
Knowledge justification is a big puzzle of epistemology.There are long term debates about the problem between contextualism and non-contextualism.Contextualism holds that knowledge has clear meaning in specific context,but skepticism refuses this idea,common-sense realism thinks that common sense intuition may refute skepticism.Contrastivism claims that the meaning of knowledge can been justified by contrasting different propositions,but invariantism affirms that knowledge does not change with changing contexts.Relativism insists that the sentence of knowledge is judged,not uttered in context.These non-contextualisms respectively put out their strategies of resolving the problem of knowledge justification.
出处
《世界哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期22-31,160,共10页
World Philosophy
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"科学表征问题研究"(12BZX018)资助
