期刊文献+

低阶煤热解多联产系统评价体系及其指标权重确定 被引量:4

Quantatative determination of index weight for overall evaluation of low rank coal pyrolysis poly-generation technologies
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用德尔菲法(Delphi)和层次分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,AHP)相结合的方法构建煤热解多联产系统评价体系分层结构模型。确定和计算各级指标权重并进行总排序的一致性检验,最终建立了技术、经济、环境、社会4个一级指标及若干个二级、三级指标构成的综合评价体系。对其各级指标权重进行排序。结果表明:一级指标中技术指标所占比重最大,依次为环境指标、经济指标、社会指标;二级指标中效率、企业收益、技术成熟度位于前列;最末端的三级指标中,工业化程度指标所占比重最大,其次是输出单位能量废水排放量,最后是企业内部收益率。 Determine the hierarchical structure model of coal pyrolysis poly-generation system with Delphi and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods. The index weight of each indicator in three grades and consistency check of the total sorts are implemented based on the AHP method. The evaluation system of low rank coal pyrolysis poly-generation is ultimately established which contains 4 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators and 17 third-level indicators. The resuhs show that, in the first-level indicators, the technical indicators are the highest, followed by the environmental, economic and social. In the second-level indicators, the order of the combination weights is determined as efficiency, enterprise income and technology maturity. In the three indicators, the subsequence of the weight is industrialization proportion, wastewater emissions and enterprise internal rate of return.
出处 《洁净煤技术》 CAS 2013年第2期69-73,共5页 Clean Coal Technology
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)资助项目(2011CB201306)
关键词 煤热解多联产 评价体系 权重 AHP low rank coal pyrolysis poly-generation evaluation system weight AHP
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1岑可法,倪明江,骆仲泱,等.循环流化床燃气蒸汽联产工艺及装置:中国,9210050312[P].1993-07-28.
  • 2姚建中,郭慕孙.煤炭拔头提取液体燃料新工艺[J].化学进展,1995,7(3):205-208. 被引量:36
  • 3岑可法,骆仲泱,王勤辉,等煤的热电气多联产技术及工程实例[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
  • 4方梦祥,骆仲泱,王勤辉,李绚天,施正伦,程乐鸣,陈冠益,倪明江,岑可法.循环流化床热、电、气三联产装置的开发和应用前景分析[J].动力工程,1997,17(4):21-27. 被引量:33
  • 5王新雷.一种新的联合能源生产工艺——热、电、煤气“三联产”[J].电站系统工程,1998,14(3):3-6. 被引量:8
  • 6Azapagic A, Millington A, Collett A. A methodology for integrating sustainability considerations into process design [ J ]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2006,84(A6) :439-452.
  • 7Carvalho A, Gani R, Matos H. Design of sustainable chemical processes:Systematic retrofit analysis generation and evaluation of alternatives [ J ]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2008,86(5 ) :328-346.
  • 8Omasa T, Kishimoto M. An attempt at decision making in tissue engineering: reactor evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [ J ]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2004,20 ( 3 ) : 173-179.
  • 9任世华,姚飞,俞珠峰.洁净煤技术评价指标体系权重确定[J].洁净煤技术,2005,11(1):9-12. 被引量:17
  • 10Gangadharan P, A Zanwar, K Zheng, et al. Sustainability assessment of polygeneration processes based on syngas derived from coal and natural gas [ J ]. Computers and Chemical Engineering,2012,39 ( 1 ) : 105-117.

二级参考文献13

共引文献106

同被引文献57

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部