摘要
无论从哲学的普遍性还是哲学的特殊性出发,中国都有哲学,这就产生了一个中国哲学史的书写问题。中国哲学史的书写有一个发展过程,20世纪上半叶才有了自觉形态的不同书写方式。中华人民共和国成立以后,马克思主义哲学成为哲学史书写的唯一参照,人们接受了日丹诺夫的哲学史定义,中国哲学史变成了两个对子斗争的历史。1980年代以后,开发螺旋结构颇为时髦。中国哲学史的书写当下还是"乱花迷眼",但"海阔天空各自飞"的多元化态势不可逆转。在多维度的书写方式中,现代视域与传统原典的结合应该是较佳选择。在这方面,杜维明对儒学的研究和表达可能会为我们提供重要的借鉴。从一定意义上说,视域决定了原典的意义,以现代视域研究传统原典符合中国哲学走向世界的历史发展趋势。
No matter from the universal philosophy or from the particularity philosophy, China has philosophy. This leads to one problem in how to write the history of Chinese philosophy. There is a development progress of writing the history of Chinese philosophy, the first hale of the 20th have different style of writing consciously. After the establishment of People＇s Republic of China, Max＇s philosophy became to the only one reference, people accept the definition of philosophy history which made by Zhdanov, the history of Chinese history become to tow pair struggle history. Since the nineteen eighties, the development of spiral structure is quite fashionable. The writing of Chinese philosophy is still ＂squandering fans eyes＂, maybe diversification is irreversible. In the multi - dimensional way of writing, combination of the modem sight and the traditional original texts is the better choice. In this regard, the expression of Du Weiming to Confucianism research may provide important reference for us. In a sense, sight determines the meaning of the original texts. Using the modem sight research the traditional original texts is conform to the historical development trend of Chinese history to the world.
出处
《河北学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期11-15,共5页
Hebei Academic Journal
基金
2009年度国家社会科学基金项目<中国哲学史学史>(09BZX032)
关键词
现代视域
传统原典
结合
中国哲学史
书写
modern sight
traditional original texts
combination
history of Chinese philosophy
writing
