期刊文献+

气管插管-肺表面活性物质-拔管后经鼻持续正压通气模式治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效研究 被引量:52

Clinical Effect of Therapy of Tracheal Intubation Plus Pulmonary Surfactant and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure after Extubation for Neonate with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨气管插管-给予肺表面活性物质(PS)-拔管后经鼻持续正压通气(nCPAP)模式治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的临床疗效情况。方法选取2006年6月—2012年6月我院儿科NICU收治的82例NRDS患儿为本研究对象,分为观察组51例和对照组31例。观察组应用气管插管-给予PS-拔管后使用nCPAP治疗模式,对照组仅给予nCPAP治疗模式。对两组治疗前后的主要血气指标、气体交换常用指标、nCPAP辅助通气治疗后24 h所需压力、nCPAP辅助通气治疗时间、用氧治疗时间、总住院时间、病情无好转或恶化的比例等进行比较。结果两组治疗前血浆酸碱度(pH)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、动脉血氧分压与吸入氧浓度的比值(PaO2/FiO2)、动脉血氧分压与肺泡氧分压比值(PaO2/PAO2)各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后6 h、24 h、48 h的pH、PaO2、PaCO2、PaO2/FiO2、PaO2/PAO2比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后24 h nCPAP所需压力、nCPAP辅助通气治疗时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组用氧治疗时间和住院时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组病情无好转或恶化的患儿有11例(21.6%),对照组有17例(54.8%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论气管插管-PS-拔管后nCPAP治疗模式应用于NRDS的治疗,可迅速改善患儿的通气和换气功能,改善患儿的缺氧与代谢性和呼吸性酸中毒状态,从而大大提高了抢救的成功率,缩短住院时间,安全且疗效显著,值得在临床上大力推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of tracheal intubation plus pulmonary surfactant (PS) adminis- tration and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation for neonate with respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) . Methods The NRDS patients who were admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, from June 2006 to June 2012, were divided as trial group ( n = 51 ) and control group ( n = 31 ) . The patients in the trial group were given the therapy of tracheal intubation plus PS administration and nCPAP after extubation, and those in the control group were given nCPAP only. The data before and after the treatment of arterial blood gas analysis results, parameters of gas exchanges, pressure needed for nCPAP 24 - h after mechanical ventilation, time of nCPAP, time of oxygen therapy, total time of hospital stay, and the changes of condition were compared between the two groups. Results Before the treatment no sig- nificant differences were found in pH, PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2 , and PaO2/PAO2 between the two groups (P 〉0. 05) ; how- ever, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h after the treatment there were significant differences in pH, PaO2, PaCO2 PaO2/FiO2, and PaO2/ PAO2 ( P 〈0. 05 ) . And the significant differences were found between the two groups in pressure needed for nCPAP 24 - h after mechanical ventilation, time of nCPAP, time of oxygen therapy, and total time of hospitalization ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . There were 11 (21.6%) patients in the trial group and 17 (54. 8% ) in the control group whose condition had no improvement or deterioration (P 〈 0. 05 ) . Conclusion The application of tracheal intubation plus PS administration and nCPAP after extubation for neonate with NRDS can rapidly improve the ventilation and significantly rectify anoxia and acidosis. So it can greatly raise the success rate for rescuing the patient and also reduce the length of hospitalization. It is Safe and highly effective, and thus worthy of populariza- tion clinically.
作者 杨一民
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期1134-1136,共3页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征 肺表面活性物质 经鼻持续正压通气 治疗结果 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Pulmonary surfactant Nasal continuous positive airway pres- sure Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献128

  • 1Narang A, Kumar P, Dutta S, et al. Surfactant therapy for hyaline membrane diseaser: the chandiarh experience [ J ]. Indian Pediantr, 2001, 38 (6): 640-646.
  • 2Morley C.Continuous distending pressure[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,1999,81:152-156.
  • 3Sherman TI,Blackson T,Touch SM,et al.Physiologic effects of CPAP:Application and monitoring[J].Neural Netw,2003,22(6):7-16.
  • 4Jonsson B,Katz-Salamon M,Faxelius G,et al.Neonatal care very low birth weight infants in special care units and neonatal intensive care units in Stockholm.Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus mechanical ventilation:Gains and losses[J].Acta Paediatr,1997,419 (suppl):4-10.
  • 5Paus-Jenssen ES,Reid JK,Cockcroft DW,et al.The use of noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure at a tertiary care center[J].Chest,2004,126(1):165-172.
  • 6Buettiker V,Hug MI,Baenziger O,et al.Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns[J].Intens Care Med,2004,30(5):926-930.
  • 7Dani C,Bertini G,Pezzati M,et al.Early extubation and nasal conti-nuous positive airway pressure after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants 《30 weeks' gestation[J].Pe-diatrics,2004,113(6):560-563.
  • 8Tooley J,Dyke M.Randomized study of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome[J].Acta Paediatr,2003,92(10):1170-1174.
  • 9Meyer M,Mildenhall L,Wong M.Outcomes for infants weighing less than 1000 grams cared for with a nasal continuous positive airway pre-ssure-based strategy[J].J Paediatr Child Health,2004,40(1-2):38-41.
  • 10Sandri F,Ancora G,Lanzoni A,et al.Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation:Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2004,89(5):394-398.

共引文献323

同被引文献343

  • 1邱文波,陈晔.小儿CPAP呼吸机配合药物治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征60例临床观察及护理[J].生物医学工程学进展,2013,34(2):117-119. 被引量:7
  • 2黄嘉言,周晓光.新生儿机械通气策略[J].广东医学,2005,26(7):878-879. 被引量:9
  • 3徐茜茜,徐海滨,陈清,包曼华.固尔苏治疗新生儿重症胎粪吸入综合征疗效观察[J].山东医药,2005,45(25):50-51. 被引量:4
  • 4初桂兰,王静,辛玥,郑军,郑荣秀,毕道濯.预防性应用表面活性剂对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征防治的研究[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(13):876-880. 被引量:31
  • 5邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:872.
  • 6孔令凯,李丽华,孔祥永,等.双水平正压通气和持续呼吸道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中应用的比较[J].实用儿科学杂志,2012,27(18):1393-1396.
  • 7Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Sansur CA, et ol. Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality commit- tee [J] . Spine (PhilaPa 1976) , 2011, 36 (15) : 1218-1228.
  • 8Gerber F, Vandamme TF, Krafft MP. Impact of perfluorooctylethane on the formation of a semi-crystalline liquid-condensed phase in a phospholipid monolayer and of perfluorooctyl bromide on the adsorp- tion of albumin on such a monolayer [J] . Comptes Rendus Chimie, 2009, 12 (1-2) : 180-187.
  • 9Millar D, Kirpalani H, Lemyre B, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pres- sure ventilation (NIPPV) does not confer benefit over nasal CPAP (NC- PAP) in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants-an international randomised triM[J]. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2012, 97(Suppl 1):A133-A134.
  • 10Sandri F, Plavka R, Ancora G, et al. Prophylactic or early selective surfactant combined with nCPAP in very preterm infants [J] . Pediatrics, 2010, 125 (6): e1402.

引证文献52

二级引证文献339

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部