期刊文献+

腹腔镜低位和超低位直肠癌保肛根治术中改良襻式回肠末端造瘘的应用价值 被引量:36

Application of modified loop ileostomy in iaparoscopic low and super-low radical resection of the rectal cancer with preservation of anus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜低位和超低位直肠癌保肛根治术中预防性使用改良襻式回肠末端造瘘的临床应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2010年1月至2012年6月江苏省苏北人民医院收治的108例直肠癌患者的临床资料。所有患者采用腹腔镜低位或超低位直肠癌保肛根治术,其中53例采用预防性改良襻式回肠末端造瘘(预造瘘组),55例未采用预防性改良襻式回肠末端造瘘(未造瘘组)。对两组患者术中和术后情况进行比较研究。计量资料采用用x±s表示,组间比较采用t检验;计数资料采用率或构成比表示,组间比较采用X2检验或Fisher确切概率法。结果预造瘘组和未造瘘组患者手术时间分别为(185±14)min和(154±12)min,术中出血量分别为(31±26)ml和(28±19)ml,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=2.34,1.82,P〉0.05);术后肛门排气时间分别为 (1.1±0.3)d和(4.2±0.6)d,术后进食时间分别为(1.1±0.2)d和(4.3±0.6)d,盆腔引流管拔出时间分别为(5.2±1.0)d和(8.4±3.9)d,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=7.25,28.12,15.34,P〈0.05);并发症发生率分别为5.7%(3/53)和21.8%(12/55),吻合口瘘发生率分别为0和12.7%(7/55),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);术后住院时间分别为(7.2±1.4)d和(12.9±4.4)d,治疗费用分别为(3.0±0.2)万元和(3.8±0.7)万元,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=34.01,7.83,P〈0.05)。结论 对腹腔镜低位和超低位直肠癌保肛根治术患者施行预防性改良襻式回肠末端造瘘,能有效降低吻合口瘘的发生,有利于患者快速康复。 Objective To investigate the value of modified loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low and superlow radical resection of the rectal cancer with reservation of anus.Methods he clinical data of 108 patients who received laparoscopic low and super low radical resection of rectal cancer with preservation of anus at the Subei Hospital of Jiangsu Province from January 2010 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty three patients who received preventive ileostomy were in the ileostomy group, and 55 patients who did not receive preventive ileostomy were in the nonileostomy group. The operation, incidence of complication and follow up of the 2 groups were analyzed. All data were analyzed using the t test, chi-square text or Fisher exact test.Results The operation time and blood loss were (185±14)minutes and (31±26)ml in the ileostomy group, and (154±12)minutes and (28±19)ml in the non ileostomy group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (t=2.34, 1.82, P〉0.05). The time to first flatus, time to liquid diet intake, time to pelvic drainage tube removal, duration of hospital stay, hospital costs were (1.1±0.3)days,(1.1±0.2)days,(5.2±1.0)days,(7.2±1.4)days,(3.0±0.2)×104 yuan in the ileostomy group, and (4.2±0.6)days,(4.3±0.6)days, (8.4±3.9)days, (12.9±4.4)days,(3.8±0.7)×104 yuan in the non ileostomy group, with significant differences between the 2 groups (t=7.25, 28.12, 15.34, 34.01, 7.83, P 〈0.05). The incidences of postoperative complications and anastomotic fistula were 5.7%(3/53) and 0 in the ileostomy group, and 21.8%(12/55) and 12.7%(7/55) in the non ileostomy group, with significant differences between the 2 groups (P〈0.05).Conclusion Modified loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low and superlow radical resection of rectal cancer can effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula, and helps the recovery of patients.
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期362-365,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(81172279)
关键词 直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 回肠造瘘 Rectal neoplasms Laparoscopy Ileostomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, et al. Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg, 2007,11 ( 1 ) : 8-15.
  • 2汪建平.重视结直肠癌外科手术患者术后生存质量的提高[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(6):625-627. 被引量:40
  • 3池畔.腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术中保护盆自主神经的手术技巧[J].中华消化外科杂志,2011,10(3):168-169. 被引量:35
  • 4陈杰,王道荣,汤东,李清国,鱼海峰,王森.结直肠吻合术后预防性回肠造口与结肠造口比较的Meta分析[J].国际外科学杂志,2012,39(8):539-545. 被引量:18
  • 5Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg,2005,92(2) :211-216.
  • 6Chen J, Wang DR, Yu HF, et al. Defunctioning stoma in low an- terior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of five recent studies. Hepatogastroenterology ,2012,59 ( 118 ) : 1828-1831.
  • 7Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Prospective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis, 2002,4(3):167-171.
  • 8Luglio G, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, et al. Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg,2011,146 (10) : 1191 - 1196.
  • 9Hignett S, Parmar CD, Lewis W, et al. Ileostomy formation does not prolong hospital length of stay after open anterior resection when performed within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis,2011,13(10) :1180-1183.
  • 10Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology, 2008, 55 ( 86/87 ) : 1562- 1567.

二级参考文献51

共引文献90

同被引文献298

引证文献36

二级引证文献300

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部