期刊文献+

新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结转阴乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检研究 被引量:6

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨新辅助化疗后腋窝降期为临床阴性乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检(sentinellymphnodebiopsy,SLNB)的可行性和准确性。方法对新辅助化疗前均经细针穿刺细胞学证实腋窝淋巴结阳性,新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结转阴的147例乳腺癌,先行SLNB再行腋窝淋巴结清扫术(axillarylymphnodedis—section,ALND),并比较。结果147例SLNB与ALND的成功率、假阴性率、准确率分别为87.07%(128/147)、14.43%(14/97)、89.06%(114/128),其中14.84%(19/128)的患者SLN为腋窝惟一阳性淋巴结。腋淋巴结转阴率24.50%(36/147),完成新辅助化疗占化疗总周期数80%以上患者腋窝淋巴结转阴率40.54%(15/37),高于不足80%患者的19.09%(21/110),差异有统计学意义(P=0.009),且SLNB成功率和准确性均提高。新辅助化疗前初始腋窝cN1期患者与eN2~3期患者比较,其SLNB的假阴性率(6.82%VS24.44%,P=0.016)和准确率(95.31%VS82.81%,P=0.023)差异有统计学意义,而新辅助化疗前初始乳腺原发肿瘤大小及新辅助化疗后乳腺原发肿瘤降期对SLNB成功率和准确性均无显著影响。联合法SLNB的成功率、假阴性率及准确性均优于单纯蓝染料法。结论新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结转阴患者SLNB技术上可行,准确性可接受;新辅助化疗后通过SLNB进行腋窝分期,可望使患者在新辅助化疗中获益最大化。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) in previous axillary node positive breast cancer patients whose axillary nodes turned negative after neoadjuvant chem- otherapy(NAC). Methods 147 consecutive breast cancer patients with clinically node-negative after NAC were retrospectively analyzed. These patients underwent SLNB followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection. All patients were proved to be axillary node-positive by fine needle aspiration cytology before NAC. Results The i- dentification rate, false negative rate and accuracy for SLNB was 87.07% ( 128/147 ) , 14.43% ( 14/97 ) and 89.06% (114/128)respectively. SLNs were the only positive nodes in 14. 84% patients( 19/128 ). The rate of pathologically negative axillary lymph node was 24. 50% (36/147), significantly higher in patients who received NAC more than 80% of the total cycles than in those who received NAC less than 80% of the total cycles (40. 54% vs 19. 09% , P = 0. 009 ), and was accompanied with improved identification rate and accuracy of SL- NB. The difference of false negative rate(6. 82% vs 24.44%, P =0. 016)and accuracy(95.31% vs 82. 81%, P = 0, 023 ) had statistical significance between patients initially in axillary cN1 and in cN2 - 3, while no connec- tion was found with the initial size and down-stage of the primary tumor. The identification rate, false negative rate and accuracy were improved in patients with combined Methylene blue and99m Tc-SC than in patients with Methylene blue alone. Conclusions It is technically feasible to perform SLNB in clinically negative-node barest cancer patients after NAC, and the SLNB accuracy remains reasonable. It is possible to maximize the benefits of NAC by using SLNB to stage the axillary lymph nodes in patients who are node-negative after NAC.
出处 《中华内分泌外科杂志》 CAS 2013年第2期111-114,共4页 Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
基金 山东省科学技术发展计划项目(2009GG10002019) 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目重点项目(2011HD012)
关键词 乳腺癌 前哨淋巴结活检 新辅助化疗 Breast cancer Sentinellymph node biopsy Neoaduvant chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer:findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18[J].J Clin Onco1,1997,15(7) :2483-2493.
  • 2Hennessy BT, Hortobagyi GN, Rouzier R, et al. Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy [ J ]. J Clin 0ncol,2005,23 (36) :9304-9311.
  • 3Li Y, Wang L, Liu Y, et al. The distrobution of axillary lymph nodes metastases and sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemo- therapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer [ J ]. Eur J Cancer,2008,6(7) :154-155.
  • 4李金锋,欧阳涛,王雪鹃,王天峰,解云涛,范照清,林宝和,杨志,林本耀.乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检的初步研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(12):865-867. 被引量:7
  • 5Xing Y, Foy M, Cox DD, et al. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer[J]. Br J Surg,2006,93(5) :539-546.
  • 6Sharkey FE, Addington SL, Fowler LJ, et al. Effects of preopera- tive chemotherapy on the morphology of resectable breast carcinoma [J]. Mod Pathol,1996,9(9):893-900.
  • 7Kuerer HM, Newman LA. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer:developments and resolving controver- sies[J]. J Clin 0ncol,2005,23(8) :1698-1705.
  • 8Kelly AM, Dwamena B, Cronin P, et al. Breast cancer sentinel node identification and classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy Systematic review and meta analysis [ J ]. Acad Radiol, 2009, 16 (5) :551-563.
  • 9van Deurzen CH, Vriens BE, Tjan-Heijnen VC, et al. Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients : a systematic review [ J ]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45 ( 18 ) : 3124-3130.
  • 10Tan VK, Goh BK, Fook-Chong S, et al. The feasibility and accura- cy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-negative patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis[ J]. J Surg Oncol,2011,104(1 ) :97-103.

二级参考文献12

  • 1李金锋,欧阳涛,王天峰,林本耀.原发性乳腺癌新辅助化疗的临床研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(8):493-495. 被引量:43
  • 2Veronesi U,Paganelli G,Viale G,et al.A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.New Engl J Med,2003,349:546-553.
  • 3Naik AM,Fey J,Gemignani M,et al.The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection:a follow-up study of 4008 procedures.Ann Surg,2004,240:462-468.
  • 4Torrenga H,Fabry H,van der Sijp JR,et al.Omitting axillary lymph node dissection in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients is safe:a long term follow-up analysis.J Surg Oncol,2004,88:4-7.
  • 5Schwartz GF,Giuliano AE,Veronesi U,et al.Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast,April 19-22 2001 Philadelphia,Pennsylvania.Cancer,2002,94:2542-2551.
  • 6Kang SH,Kang JH,Choi EA,et al.Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast Cancer,2004,11:233-241.
  • 7Kinoshita T,Takasugi M,Iwamoto E,et al.Sentinel lymph node biopsy examination for breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Am J Surg,2006,191:225-229.
  • 8Khan A,Sabel MS,Nees A,et al.Comprehensive axillary evaluation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients with ultrasonography and sentinel lymph node biopsy.Ann Surg Oncol,2005,12:679-704.
  • 9Goyal A,Newcombe RG,Mansel RE,et al.Role of routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.Eur J Cancer,2005,41:238-243.
  • 10Park C,Seid P,Morita E,et al.Internal mammary sentinel lymph node mapping for invasive breast cancer:implications for staging and treatment.Breast J,2005,11:29-33.

共引文献6

同被引文献105

  • 1王永胜.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的安全性[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(9):685-688. 被引量:28
  • 2陈波,陆云飞,薛明兴,叶春梅,黄自明.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检对腋窝淋巴结状态的预测价值研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(11):1115-1117. 被引量:4
  • 3Brouckaert O, Laenen A, Smeets A, et al. Prognostic impli- cations of lobular breast cancer histology: new insights from asingle hospital cross- sectional study and SEER data [J] . Breast, 2014, 23 (4): 371-377.
  • 4Takei H, Kurosumi M, Yoshida T, et al. Axillary lymph node dissection can be avoided in women with breast cancer with in- traoperative, false -negative sentinel iymph node biopsies [J] . Breast Cancer, 2010, 17 (1) : 9-16.
  • 5Pijpers R, Borgstein P J, Teule GJ, et al. Vital dye and radio- labelled colloids - complement or alternative? [J]. Recent Results Cancer Res, 2000, 157: 130-137.
  • 6Ueda NI,Tada K,Miyata S,et al.Identification of sentinel lymph node location based on body surface landmarks in early breast cancer patients.[J].Breast Cancer.2009;16(3):219-222.
  • 7Cowher MS,Grobmyer SR,Lyons J,et al.Conservative axillary surgery in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy:long-term results[J].J Am Coll Surg.2014;218(4):819-824.
  • 8BONNEFOI H, LITIERE S, PICCART M, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor irrespective of simplified breast cancer intrinsic subtypes: a landmark and two-step approach analyses from the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial [ J ] . Ann Oncol, 2014, 25(6): 1128-1136.
  • 9CORTAZAR P, ZHANG L, UNTCH M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis [ J ] . Lancet, 2014, 384(9938): 164-172.
  • 10BERRUTI A, AMOROSO V, GALLO F, et al. Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(34): 3883-3891.

引证文献6

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部