期刊文献+

英国南极“伊丽莎白女王领地”主权合法性研究 被引量:2

On the Legality of Britain's Sovereignty over“Queen Elizabeth Land”in Antarctica
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 英国对南极"伊丽莎白女王领地"主张主权,其合法性存在争议。依据先占的规则,参照人类在南极及其附近地区的实际控制能力,英国没有实际控制"伊丽莎白女王领地",不能基于先占取得在该地区的主权。由于《南极条约》的效力,目前英国"伊丽莎白女王领地"的主权主张不能影响此地区的主权归属,其主权归属仍处于未定的状态;"伊丽莎白女王领地"主张的提出也违反了《南极条约》的宗旨,英国不享有对"伊丽莎白女王领地"所在地区的主权。 Britain's claim of the sovereignty over the'Queen Elizabeth Land'in Antarctica has caused controversy.Taking the capacity of effective control of human beings in the Antarctica and its adjacent areas into consideration,according to the rule of occupation,Great Britain has not maintained effective control over the area of the 'Queen Elizabeth Land'and thus cannot acquire the sovereignty over such area on the basis of occupation.In the context of the Antarctic Treaty,the current claim of sovereignty over the area of'Queen Elizabeth Land' cannot have any effect on the sovereignty over such area.The sovereignty of this area remains unclear.Furthermore,the claim of sovereignty in this area is inconsistent with the objective of the Antarctic Treaty.Therefore,Great Britain cannot acquire the sovereignty over the'Queen Elizabeth Land'.
作者 李任远
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期26-31,79-80,共6页 International Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Foreign & Commonwealth Office," The Foreign Secretary Has Announced that the Southern Part of British Antarctic Territory Has Been Named Queen Elizabeth Land", available at. https.//www, gov. uk/government/news/ queen-elizabeth-land.
  • 2Wikipedia, " British Antarctic Territory", available at. http.//en, wikipedia, org/wiki/British_Antarctic Territory ~ cite_note-IntLaw.
  • 3Wikipedia, "Flakland Islands Dependendes" available at. http.//on, wikipedia, org/wild/Falkland_Islands_ Dependencies.
  • 4http.//www. antarctica, ac. uk/index, php.
  • 5See the Western Sahara Case, Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice, 16 October 1975, Para. 81, a- vailable at. http.//www, icj-cij, org/docket/index, php? pl =3&p2 = 4&k= 69&rase = 61&t.ode= sa&p3 = 4.
  • 6See The Island of Palmas Case (or Miangas), Award of Permanent Court of Arbitration, 4 April 1928, p14, available at. http.//www. pca-cpa, org/showpage, asp? pag_id = 1029.
  • 7See the Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan Case, Judgment of International Court of Justice, 17 December 2002, paras. 63-64, paras. 143--147, a- vailable at. http.//www, icj-cij, org/docket/index, php? pl =3&p2 = 3&k= dtBa.ase= 102&code= inmaSep3.
  • 8See The Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea Case, Judgment of International Court of Justice, October 7 2007, Paras 187-208, available at. http..//www, icj-cij, org/ docket/index, php? pl = 3&p2 = 3&code = nt~ase = 120&k.
  • 9See the Case of Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/ Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge, Judgment of International Court of Justice, 23 May 2008, paras 233-272, available at. http.//www, icj-cij, org/ docket/index, php? pl = 3&p2 = 3&k = 2t~.case = 130&code = rnasi&p3 =4.
  • 10See The Island of Palmas Case (or Miangas), Award of Permanent Court of Arbitration, 4 April 1928, paras 8, 34, available at. http.//www, pca-cpa, org/showpage, asp? pag__id= 1029.

二级参考文献10

共引文献16

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部