期刊文献+

论化解农村金融排斥的创新模式--林业碳汇交易引导资金回流农村的实证分析 被引量:18

STUDY ON THE INNOVATION MODE OF RURAL FINANCE——An Empirical Analysis of Forestry Carbon Sequestration Transaction
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,农村金融排斥已十分严重,极大地影响着农村经济发展,主要原因是政府出台的化解政策无法解决金融机构开展农村金融服务与实现利润最大化目标的矛盾。本文认为,发展林业碳汇交易是化解农村金融排斥的创新模式,能够引导资金回流农村,促进金融机构在支持林业碳汇交易的同时实现自身商业化可持续发展,并以广西珠江流域再造林林业碳汇项目为案例,对其化解农村金融排斥的成效进行了实证检验。开展林业碳汇交易顺应绿色环保潮流,具有持续化解农村金融排斥的作用。政府应大力促进林业碳汇交易发展。 The rural financial exclusion had greatly influenced the development of the rural economy. The main reason was that financial institutions could not achieve the goal of profit maximization when they carry out financial services in rural areas. This study showed that the forestry carbon sequestration trans-action was an innovation mode for defusing the problem of rural financial exclusion, which would guide the flow of capital back into rural areas, and promote financial institutions to realize their own sustainable development. This paper applied the Guangxi Pearl River Basin forest carbon sequestration project to em-pirically verify the effectiveness of forestry carbon sequestration trade. Developing forest carbon sequestra-tion transactions could play the role on defusing rural financial exclusion, which should be vigorously pro-moted by government.
出处 《经济理论与经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期43-50,共8页 Economic Theory and Business Management
基金 中澳科学研究基金项目(ACSRF-1030310-67) 中国环境保护部专项基金项目(2012020083)
关键词 农村金融排斥 林业碳汇交易 引导资金回流农村 rural financial exclusion forestry carbon sequestration trade guide capital back into ru-ral area
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Rohit Jindal, Brent Swallow, John Kerr. Forestry-based Carbon Sequestration Projects in Africa: Potential Benefits and Challenges [J]. Natural Resources Forum, 2008, (32).
  • 2Emily Boyd, Maria Gutierrez, Manyu Chang. Small-scale Forest Carbon Proiects: Adapting CDM to Low-income Communities [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 17 (2).
  • 3Andrew Leyshon, Nigel Thrift. Geographies of Financial Exclusion: Financial Abandonment in Britain and the United States[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , 1995 , 20 (3).
  • 4Financial Services Authority (FSA). In or Out? Financial Exclusion: A Literature and Research Review [R]. Lon- don: FSA, Consumer Research Paper 3, 2000.
  • 5王志军.金融排斥:英国的经验[J].世界经济研究,2007(2):64-68. 被引量:64
  • 6王修华,邱兆祥.农村金融排斥:现实困境与破解对策[J].中央财经大学学报,2010(10):47-52. 被引量:70
  • 7李怒云,宋维明.气候变化与中国林业碳汇政策研究综述[J].林业经济,2006(5):60-64. 被引量:75
  • 8Pablo Benitez , Ian Mceallum , Michael Obersteiner , Yoshiki Yamagata. Global Supply for Carbon Sequestration: Identifying Least-cost Afforestation Sites under Country Risk Considerations [Z]. Laxenburg: International Institutefor Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), 2004.
  • 9李怒云,杨炎朝,陈叙图.发展碳汇林业 应对气候变化——中国碳汇林业的实践与管理[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(1):13-16. 被引量:42
  • 10Sebastian Thomas, Paul Dargusch, Steve Harrison. Why Are There So Few Afforestation and Reforestation Clean Development Mechanism Projects? [J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, (27).

二级参考文献45

共引文献251

同被引文献371

引证文献18

二级引证文献437

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部