期刊文献+

经椎旁肌间隙入路与传统后正中入路腰椎融合术治疗L_5S_1腰椎间盘突出症对比研究 被引量:6

Comparison of paraspinal intermuscular approach and conventional posterior approach on treatment of L5S1 single-level lumbar disc herniation
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨经椎旁肌间隙手术入路在L5S1单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者腰椎融合手术中的应用价值。[方法]自2011年16月,对32例L5S1单节段腰椎间盘突症患者进行经椎间孔减压椎间植骨融合手术(transforaminallumbar interbody fusion,TLIF),其中采用经椎旁肌间隙手术入路15例(A组),采用后正中入路17例(B组)。统计分析两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、VAS评分、术后卧床时间及手术并发症的差异。[结果]A组手术时间(104.80±12.60)min、术中出血(134.00±33.55)ml、术后引流量(92.73±13.23)ml,术后VAS评分(1.93±0.59)分、术后卧床时间(2.60±0.38)d,切口愈合不良2例,无其他并发症,术后并发症发生率为13.3%。B组手术时间(129.18±33.88)min、术中出血(188.53±57.98)ml、术后引流量(125.00±53.29)ml、术后VAS评分(3.17±0.88)分、术后卧床时间(4.03±0.69)d,硬膜损伤致脑脊液漏1例,切口愈合不良2例,无其他并发症,术后并发症发生率为17.6%。两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后VAS评分及卧床时间均有显著差异(P<0.05),A组明显优于B组;两组患者术后并发症无显著差异(P>0.05)。[结论]采用经椎旁肌间隙入路行经椎间孔减压椎间植骨融合手术治疗L5S1单节段腰椎间盘突出症有助于术中减少手术创伤、保护椎旁肌及准确置入内固定物,是一种微创、便捷、安全的手术入路。 [ Objective ] To evaluate the clinical efficacy of paraspinal intermuscular approach on treatment of L5 S1 single - level lumbar disc herniation. [ Methods] Clinical material of 32 patients who had lumbar disc herniation surgery using transfo- raminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in L5 S1 level was collected from January 2011 to June 2011. Study group comprised 15 patients who received operations with paraspinal intermuscular approach. Control group included 17 patients who received opera- tions with conventional posterior approach. Operative duration, blood loss, drainage, postoperative VAS scores, postoperative duration in bed and postoperative complication rate were compared separately by statistical analysis. [ Results ] In study group receiving operations with paraspinal intermuscular approach, the average operative duration was (104. 80 ±12. 60) rain; the av- erage blood loss was ( 134.00±33.55 ) ml; the average drainage was (92. 73 ± 13.23 ) ml; the average postoperative VAS score was ( 1.93 ±0. 59) ; and the average postoperative duration in bed was (2. 60 ±0. 38) d; incision poor healing was found in 2 patients; complication rate was 13.3%. In control group receiving operations with conventional posterior approach, the av- erage operative duration was (129. 18 ± 33.88) min; the average blood loss was (188.53 ± 57.98) ml; the average drainage was (125.00± 53.29) ml; the average postoperative VAS score was (3.17 ± 0. 88) ; and the average postoperative duration in bed was (4. 03 ± 0. 69) d; incision poor healing and cerebrospinal fluid leakage were found in 2 patients and 1 patient respec- tively; complication rate was 17.6%. In terms of the average operative duration, the average blood loss, the average drainage,the average postoperative VAS scores and postoperative duration in bed, significant differences were analyzed between two groups (P 〈 0. 05 ), where study group showed better efficacy than control group. By contrast, no significant difference was found in postop- erative complication rate ( P 〉 0. 05 ) . [ Conclusion ] Paraspi-nal intermuscular approach on treatment of single - level lumbar disc herniation in L5 S1 helps reduce the invasive, protect pa- raspinal muscle and fix the pedicle screws, which is regarded as an accurate, minimally invasive and safe option.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期874-878,共5页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 经椎旁肌间隙入路 腰椎融合术 腰椎间盘突出症 L5S1 paraspinal intermuscular approach, lumbar interbody fusion, lumbar disc herniation, L5 S1
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李华,陈轶,刘丽君,贾哲,席生清,印弘.MRI对腰椎间盘脱出髓核游离的诊断价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2008,24(6):813-815. 被引量:12
  • 2付克广,李廷林,任法云,段庆红,滕录侠,孙耀辉.腰椎间盘突出症的CT诊断与临床病理分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2003,19(12):1105-1107. 被引量:15
  • 3Stevens K J, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, et al. Comparison of mini- really invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion u- sing magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006,2:77 - 86.
  • 4Fan S, Hu Z. Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of poste- rior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally in'asive procedure versus conventional open approach [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2010,2:316 - 324.
  • 5Park P, Garton H J, Gala VC, et al, Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion : review of the literature [ J ]. Spine, 2004,17 : 1938 - 1944.
  • 6Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchenl SH, et al. Clinical and radio- graphic outcomes of anterior lumber interbody fusion using recombi- nant human bone morphogenetic protein -2 [ J]. Spine,2002,21 : 2396 - 2408.
  • 7任忠明,吴宏飞,张远,张玉良,张银华.双侧小切口椎旁肌间隙入路在下腰椎融合术中应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(15):1356-1359. 被引量:8
  • 8Palmer DK, Allen JL, Williams PA,et al. Multilevel MRI analysis of multifidus- longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine and potertial clinical applications to Wihse s paraspinal approach [ J ]. Spine ,2011,16 : 1263 - 1267.
  • 9潘杰,钱列,谭军.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(21):1624-1628. 被引量:19
  • 10邹德威,吴继功,谭荣,马华松,邵燕翔,彭军,程晓非.后路旁肌间隙入路在腰椎手术的临床应用[J].中华外科杂志,2010,48(4):271-275. 被引量:31

二级参考文献73

共引文献221

同被引文献90

引证文献6

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部