摘要
目的比较不同针灸方法治疗第3腰椎横突综合征的临床疗效。方法 90例第3腰椎横突综合征患者分成电针组(n=30)、温针组(n=30)和普通针刺组(n=30),分别采用电针、温针及普通针刺治疗,共20次。于治疗前后采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)及日本骨科学会下腰痛评分(JOA)进行评定。结果治疗后,3组VAS评分较治疗前显著降低(P<0.001),JOA评分显著提高(P<0.001),电针组效果最佳(P<0.05)。结论 3种针灸方法均对第3腰椎横突综合征有很好治疗作用,其中电针效果最佳。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of electroacupuncture, warm needling therapy and acupuncture on the third lum- bar transverse process syndrome. Methods 90 patients were assigned to receive electroacupuncture therapy （n=30）, warm needling therapy （n=30） and acupuncture therapy （n=30） for 20 times. They were assessed with Visual Analogue Scale （VAS） and Japanese Orthopaedic Asso- ciation （JOA） scoring systems for lower back pain before and after treatment. Results The scores of JOA increased and the scores of VAS de- creased significantly in all the groups after treatment （P〈0.001）. Both the scores were better in the electroacupuncture group （P〈0.05）. Con- clusion Electroacupuncture, warm needling therapy, and acupuncture are effective on the third lumbar transverse process syndrome, among which the electroacupuncture is most effective.
出处
《中国康复理论与实践》
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第4期378-380,共3页
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词
第3腰椎横突综合征
针刺
电针
温针
third lumbar transverse process syndrome
acupuncture
electroacupuncture
warm needling
