期刊文献+

R&D资本化与费用化政策选择的影响因素研究 被引量:31

The influencing factors of policy choice on R&D capitalization and expensing
原文传递
导出
摘要 以2007-2010年年报披露研发投入数据的沪深A股上市公司1071个观测值为样本,从R&D投入会计处理方法选择的角度分析企业进行R&D资本化与费用化政策选择的影响因素。研究结果表明:新会计准则对R&D投入会计报告的变革有一定的积极意义,R&D资本化与费用化的选择受到了企业特征的影响。研发强度大、盈利水平低、规模较小、负债水平高、股权分散、研发投入不稳定且处于扭亏临界和高技术行业的公司倾向于选择将R&D资本化,而那些规模较大,盈利水平高、负债率低、股权相对集中、研发投入稳定的企业则倾向于将R&D费用化。另外,R&D资本化与费用化的选择与其系统风险、成长性和收益平滑动机没有显著关系。 Using a sample of 1071 observations from China listed companies that disclosed information on R&D over the period of 2007 -2010, from the perspective of the accounting treatment of R&D expenditures, this paper studied the influencing factors of policy choice on R&D capitalization and expensing. The empirical findings show that accounting choice for R&D expenditures is affected by thc characteristics of the companies. Capitalization is preferred by those companies which are greater R&D intensity, less profitable, smaller size, more highly leverage, lower ownership concentration, non - steady - state of R&D investment, high - tech industry and in the condition of losses. While the firms choosing to expense R&D are larger, higher profitable, lower leveraged, more concentrate own- ership and in steady - state for R&D. Moreover, weaker evidence shows any relation between systematic risk, growth, smoothing profits and accounting choice for R&D.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期546-553,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71203174) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(10YJC630257) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(K5051206005)
关键词 R&D投入 R&D资本化 R&D费用化 政策选择 R&D investment R&D capitalization R&D expensing policy choice
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Healy P M,et al.R&D accounting and the trade-offbetween relevance and objectivity[J].Journal of Ac-counting Research,2002,40(3):677-770.
  • 2Fields T D,Lys T L,Vincentb L.Empirical researchon accounting choice[J].Journal of Accounting and E-conomics,2001,31:255-307.
  • 3Healy P M.The effect of bonus schemes on accountingdecisions[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,1985,7:85-107.
  • 4Gaver J J,Gaver K M,Austin J R.Additional evidenceon bonus plans and income management[J].Journal ofAccounting and Economics,1995,19(1):3-28.
  • 5Deangelo H,Deangelo L,Skinner D J.Accountingchoice in troubled companies[J].Journal of Account-ing and Economics,1994,17:113-143.
  • 6Sweeney A P.Debt-covenant violations and managers’accounting responses[J].Journal of Accounting and E-conomics,1994,17:281-308.
  • 7Watts R T,Zimmerman J L.Positive Accounting Theory[M].Prentice-Hall Inc.,1986.
  • 8Daley L A,Vigeland R L.The effect of debt covenantsand political costs on the choice of accounting methods[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,1983,5:195-211.
  • 9Aboody D,Lev B.The value relevance of intangibles:the case of software capitalization[J].Journal of Ac-counting Research,1998,36(Suppl.):161-191.
  • 10Landry S.The effect of management incentives and crosslisting status on the accounting treatment of R&D spend-ing[D].The 2003 Annual Conference CGAA CountingResearch Centre,2002.49-73.

二级参考文献54

共引文献715

同被引文献304

引证文献31

二级引证文献320

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部