期刊文献+

全球治理机制面临的挑战及中国的对策 被引量:49

On the Challenges of Global Governance Mechanism and China's Countermeasures
原文传递
导出
摘要 当前的全球治理机制脱胎于美国主导的霸权稳定体系,现在面临美国实力相对衰落、新兴大国崛起、国际金融危机引发新的全球性问题等多方面的挑战。未来五到十年,世界各国对全球治理改革的需求将前所未有地强烈。尽管可能遭遇国际政治权力博弈中的"二把手困境",但中国仍然面临全面参与全球治理的重大战略机遇期。为了有针对性地应对不同层面的全球治理,本文将与全球治理有关的国际规则分为三类:一是现行主要的全球治理体制与规则,主要是指包括联合国、布雷顿森林机构在内的目前由发达国家主导的全球性治理机制;二是正在演进中或可能发生重大变革的全球治理体制与规则,是指一些发达国家主导或与新兴国家共同主导的,新兴以及通过变革将具备潜在的世界性影响的国际治理机制;三是未来可能具有系统重要性的新体制与规则,指目前影响力有限,主要由新兴国家倡建和参与,未来发展前景向好的新机制。针对不同类型的治理机制,作者提出了中国参与应遵循的原则,分别是权责相适原则、利益包容原则和有区别的共同责任原则。 The current global governance mechanism emerges from hegemonic stability system led by the U.S.,and is facing many challenges,including the relative decline of U.S.strength,the rise of emerging powers and global problems arising from the international financial crisis.In the next five to ten years,the demand for the reform of the global governance will be unprecedentedly strong.Although suffering from the riskof the 'second-in-command dilemma',China is still faced with a major strategic opportunity for full participation in global governance.This article divides the international rules of global governance into three categories(1) the current major system and rules of global governance;(2) the evolving global governance system and rules with a great potential for transformation;(3) the new system and rules that may bear great systemic importance.Among different types of governance mechanisms,China should engage according to many given principles:Approaching the institutional reform of the UN and the Bretton Woods is suited to the principle of balance between power and responsibility;replying to the issues of the G20,TPP,OECD should adapt to the principle of inclusive interests;the emphasized principle should be differentiated but common responsibility concerning the BRICS,neighboring cooperation and the agenda of climate change.
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期19-39,156-157,共21页 World Economics and Politics
关键词 全球治理 “二把手困境” 新兴大国 包容性利益 有区别的共同责任 global governance second-in-command dilemma emerging power inclusive interests differentiated but common responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Robert Gilpin, U. S. Power and the Multinational Corporation, New York: Basie Books, 1975.
  • 2Stephen D. Krasner, "State Power and the Structure of International Trade," World Politics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1976, pp. 317-347.
  • 3Barry Eichengreen, "Hegemonic Stability Theories of the International Monetary System," NBER Working Paper 2193, 1989.
  • 4Elke Krahmann, "American Hegemony or Global Governance? Competing Visions of International Security," International Studies Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2005, pp. 531-545.
  • 5Richard Peet, Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank, and the WTO, London: Zed Books, 2003, pp. 37-38.
  • 6Robert Hunter Wade, "US Hegemony and the World Bank: The Fight over People and Ideas," Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2002, pp. 215-243.
  • 7Ngaire Woods, "The United States and the International Financial Institutions: Power and Influence within the World Bank and the IMF," in Rosemary Foot, Neil McFarlane and Michael Mastanduno, eds., US Hegemony and International Organizations, Oxford: Oxford U- niversity Press, 2003, lap. 92-114.
  • 8Robert K. Fleck and Christopher Kilby, "World Bank Independence: A Model and Statistical Analysis of US Influence," Review of Development Economics, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2006, pp. 224-240.
  • 9Axel Dreher and Nathan M. Jensen, "Independent Actor or Agent? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of U. S. Interests on IMF Conditions," Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2007, pp. 105- 124.
  • 10罗伯特·基欧汉著,苏长和等译.《霸权之后.世界政治经济中的合作与纷争》,上海.上海人民出版社2001年版.

二级参考文献132

引证文献49

二级引证文献500

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部