期刊文献+

急性缺血性脑卒中的OCSP分型与Essen卒中风险评分 被引量:2

OCSP subtypes and ESRS in acute non-cardiac ischemic stroke
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 Essen卒中风险评估(ESRS)体系可准确评估非心源性缺血性脑卒中(IS)复发的风险。本研究立意于探索急性缺血性脑卒中的OCSP分型与ESRS之间的关系。方法①对连续纳入的非心源性IS患者行ESRS评估,将其分为低风险组(ESRS<3分)和高风险组(ESRS≥3分);②OCSP分型:完全前循环卒中(TACI),部分前循环卒中(PACI),腔隙性卒中(LACI)和后循环卒中(POCI)。比较不同ESRS分值组之间OCSP分型的构成。结果纳入的316例非心源性IS患者中低风险组93例(29.4%),高风险组223例(70.6%),动脉粥样硬化性脑梗死患者(AT)161例(50.9%)。PACI者143例(45.3%),LACI者99例(31.3%),POCI者43例(13.6%),TACI者31例(9.8%)。所有患者中,不同OCSP分型在不同ESRS分值组的构成分布在统计学上没有显著性差异(P=0.111);不同OCSP分型在高低风险组间的构成分布在统计学上无显著性差异(P=0.397)。AT患者中,不同ESRS分值组的OCSP分型的分布也没有明显的统计学差异(P=0.817);高、低风险组中的OCSP分型的分布无显著的差异(P=0.885)。结论本研究提示:①非心源性急性缺血性脑卒中的再发风险的大小与其发生的部位可能无关联;②AT的卒中发生部位与再发风险尚无明确的关联性,风险愈高,并不意味着某部位卒中病灶出现的概率就愈高。 Objective ESRS ( Essen stroke risk score) could be used to measure the recurrent risks of acute non-cardiac ischemic stroke. We tried to explore the relationships between subtypes according to OCSP (Oxfordshire community stroke project) and ESRS in these patients. Methods We divided consecutive patients with acute non-cardiac ischemic stroke into group of high risk and low risk, according to if their ESRS was higher than 3 points. We compared the proportion of each OCSP subtype in groups of different ESRS level. We also used modified TOAST system (trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment)to evaluate stroke etiologies. Results We had 316 eligible patients in total, 29.4% of which were brought into low risk group and the rest into high risk group. There were 161 patients with AT (atherothrombosis) according to modified TOAST system. There were 143 patients (45. 3% ) with PACI (partial anterior circulation infarct), 99 (31. 3%) with LACI (lacunar infarct), 43 (13. 6%) with POCI (posterior circulation infarct) and 31 with TACI (total anterior circulation infarct). The proportion of each OCSP subtype in groups of different ESRS level had no significant difference statistically in all patients (P = 0.111 ). So did in groups of high risk and low risk (P = 0.397). Among the patients with AT, distribution of OCSP subtypes in groups of different ESRS and different risk had no significant difference statistically ( P = 0. 817, P = 0. 885, respectively). Conclusions Our study indicated that ESRS of patients with acute non-cardiac ischemic stroke may not be related to their OCSP subtype. It could be interpreted that patients with high recurrent risk would not have a specific location where ischemic lesion happens more often.
出处 《中华脑血管病杂志(电子版)》 2012年第6期15-19,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition)
关键词 缺血性脑卒中 OCSP分型 危险因素 Ischemic stroke OCSP subtype Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Adams R J, Chimowitz MI, Alpert JS, et al. Coronary risk evaluation in patients with transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the stroke council and the council on clinical cardiology of the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke, 2003, 34 : 2310-2322.
  • 2Diener H, Ringleb PA, Savi P. Clopidogrel for the secondary preven-tion of stroke. Exp Opin Pharmacother, 2005, 6:755-764.
  • 3Weimar C, Goertler M, Rother J, et al. Systemic risk score evaluation in ischemic stroke patients (SCALA) : a prospective cross sectional study in 85 German stroke units. J Neurol, 2007, 254 ( 11 ) :1562-1568.
  • 4CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events ( C APRIE ). Lancet, 1996, 348 : 1329-1539.
  • 5Diener HC. Modified-release dipyridamole combined with aspirin for secondary stroke prevention. Aging Health, 2005, 1 : 19-26.
  • 6Bamford J, Sandercock P, DennisM, et al. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet, 1991, 337: 1521-1526.
  • 7Sang Won Han, Seo Hyun Kim, Jong Yun Lee, et al. A New subtype classification of ischemic stroke based on treatment and etiologic mechanism. Eur Neurol, 2007, 57:96-102.
  • 8李振东,黄如训.缺血性卒中OCSP分型研究进展[J].国外医学(脑血管疾病分册),2002,10(2):104-106. 被引量:11
  • 9Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Flossmann E, et al. A simple score (ABCD) to identify individuals at high early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet, 2005, 366: 29-36.
  • 10栗文彬,刘学东,王波,徐德忠.老年缺血性脑卒中患者按牛津郡社区脑卒中规划临床分型与预后的关系[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2008,10(6):444-446. 被引量:12

二级参考文献26

  • 1张微微,黄勇华,李娟,冯军,魏亚洲.缺血性卒中患者按牛津郡社区卒中规划分型与预后关系的临床研究[J].北京医学,2006,28(4):193-195. 被引量:1
  • 2刘学东,吕亚丽,王波,徐德忠.老年缺血性脑卒中患者预后及其影响因素的研究[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2007,9(4):240-243. 被引量:19
  • 3方侃,王为珍,祝茗.急性脑梗死OCSP分型与影像学分型的关系[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(7):866-868. 被引量:8
  • 4Ilzecka J, Stelmasiak Z. Practical significance of ischemic stroke OCSP (Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project) classification. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 2000, 34(1 ): 11-22.
  • 5Mead GE, Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS, et al. Relationship between pattern of intracranial artery abnormalities on transcranial Doppler and Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project clinical classification of ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2000, 31(3): 714-719.
  • 6Mead GE, Lewis SC, Wardlaw JM, et al. How well does the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification predict the site and size of the infarct on brain imaging? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2000, 68(5): 558-562.
  • 7Al-Buhairi AR, Phillips S J, Liewellyn G, et al. Prediction of infarct topography using the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification of stroke subtypes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 1998, 7(5):339-343.
  • 8Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS, Lindley RI, et al. The validity of a simple clinical classification of acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol, 1996, 243(3): 274-279.
  • 9Sharma JC, Fletcher S, Vassallo M, et al. Prognostic value of CT scan features in acute ischemic stroke and relationship with clinical stroke syndromes. Int J Clin Pract, 2000,54(8)514-518.
  • 10Tei H, Uchiyama S, Ohara K, et al. Deteriorating ischemic stroke in 4 clinical categories classified by the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke, 2000, 31(9): 2049-2054.

共引文献21

同被引文献26

  • 1吴丽娥,刘鸣,张月辉,赵晓玲,杨杰,谈颂,张世洪,吴波,谭燕,王清芳,王丽春,李伟.缺血性脑卒中TOAST病因分型和预后[J].中华神经科杂志,2004,37(4):292-295. 被引量:88
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33089
  • 3Adnan Ⅰ. Qureshi,Andrei V. Alexandrov,Charles H. Tegeler,Robert W. Hobson Ⅱ,J. Dennis Baker,L. Nelson Hopkins,陈红兵(译),刘新峰(译).颅外段颈动脉疾病筛查指南——美国神经影像学学会多学科实践指南委员会向医疗卫生专业人员的声明:血管和介入神经病学学会共同倡议[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2007,15(4):241-261. 被引量:9
  • 4Ward AB. A literature review of the pathophysiology and onset of post stroke spasticity[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2012, 19: 21-27.
  • 5Kong KH, Lee J, Chua KS. Occurrence and temporal evolution of upper limb spasticity in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2012, 93: 143-148.
  • 6中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组急性缺血陛卒中诊治指南撰写组.中国急性缺血性卒中诊治指南2010[J].中华神经科杂志,2010,43:146-153.
  • 7Lundstrom E, Teront A, Borg J. Prevalence of disabling spasticity 1 year after first-ever stroke[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2008, 15: 533-539.
  • 8Wissel J, Schelosky LD, Scott J, etal. Early development of spasticity following stroke: a prospective, observational trial[J]. J Neurol, 2010, 257: 1067-1072.
  • 9Urban PP, Wolf TM, Marx J J, et al. Occurrence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41:2016-2020.
  • 10Sommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Ak W. Spasticity after stroke: an overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2012, 91: 814-820.

引证文献2

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部