2Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM. The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1986,2( 1 ) :20-34.
3Sleder FS, Ludlow MO, Bohacek JR. Long-term sealing ability of calcium hydroxide sealer. J Endod, 1991, 17(11) :541-543.
4Rehman K, Saunders WP, Foye RH, et al. Calcium ion diffusion from calcium hydroxide-containing materials in endodonticallytreated teeth: an in vitro study. Int Endod J, 1996, 29 (4): 271-279.
5Grondahl K, Grondahl HG, Webber RL. Influnce of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. J Clin Periodantol, 1984, 11 (6) :411-420.
6Hausmann E, Christsson L , Dunford R, et al. Usefulness of subtraction radiography in the evaluation of periodontal therapy. J Periodontol, 1985,56( 11 Suppl) :4-7.
7Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Webber RL, et al. Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res, 1987,22(5 ) :396-402.
8Kullendorff B, Grondahl K, Rohlin M, et al. Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periapical bone lesions. Ended Dent Traumatol, 1988,4 (6) :253-259.
9Ortman LF, Dunford R, McHenry K, et al. Subtraction radiography and computer assisted densitometric analyses of standardized radiographs. A comparison study with ^125Ⅰ absorptionmetry. J Periodontal Res, 1985, 20(6) :644-651.
10Reddy MS,Jeffeoat MK. Digital subtraction radiography. Advances in Dent Clin North Am, 1993, 37(4) :553-565.
