期刊文献+

股深动脉开通与股浅动脉支架植入治疗下肢缺血的对照研究 被引量:7

Case-control comparison of percutaneous intervention in deep femoral artery and stent implantation in superficial femoral artery for chronic critical limb ischemia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的对照研究经皮股深动脉成形术和(或)支架植入术与股浅动脉支架植入术治疗伴有股深动脉狭窄的慢性长节段股浅动脉狭窄/闭塞所致严重下肢缺血的临床疗效。方法 2009年8月至2012年8月,68例伴有股深动脉狭窄的股浅动脉长节段性闭塞(TASCⅡ分级C级)患者接受了股浅动脉支架植入术或股深动脉成形术和(或)支架植入术。对两组36例(18对)符合配对标准的患者进行了回顾性分析,比较两种疗法的疗效。研究终点为严重下肢缺血症状复发,需外科旁路手术、截肢或死亡。平均随访28个月。结果介入治疗后28个月时,两组在即刻及中远期临床疗效方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。股深动脉成形和(或)支架植入组所需手术费用明显低于股浅动脉支架植入组。多变量分析证实膝下动脉流出道的通畅情况是影响预后的独立因素。结论对于伴有股深动脉严重狭窄的慢性长节段股浅动脉狭窄/闭塞所致严重下肢缺血患者,股深动脉成形和(或)支架植入术可获得与股浅动脉开通及支架植入术相似的临床疗效。 Objective To compare preoperative and postoperative findings and clinical progress in patients with peripheral arterial disease due to long segmental occlusion in superficial femoral artery (SFA) with stenosis in deep femoral artery (DFA) undergoing PTA or stent implantation in DFA and conventional stent implantation in SFA. Methods Between 2009 to 2012, 68 patients with long segmental occlusion in SFA with stenosis in DFA underwent interventional procedures. A retrospective analysis of 18 matched patient pairs (interventional revascularization in DFA and stent implantation in SFA) was performed. Endpoints were in-stent stenosis, surgical operation, amputation and death. Mean length of follow up was 28 months. Results At 28 months after interventions, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between PTA and/ or stent implantation in DFA and stent implantation in SFA. The operation expense of PTA and/or stent implantation in DFA is significantly lower than stent implantation in SFA. Preoperative patency of crural outflow arteries was an independent prognostic factor in multivariable analysis. Conclusion There were no significant outcome differences between PTA and/or stent implantation in DFA or stent implantation in SFA in patients who had interventional treatment for chronic critical limb ischemia due to long segmental occlusion in SFA with proximal stenosis or occlusion in DFA.
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期283-287,共5页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
关键词 下肢缺血 股深动脉 球囊成形术 支架植入术 病例对照研究 ischemia of lowerextremity deep femoral artery balloonangioplasty stent implantation comparisonstudy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Intersociety consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC Ⅱ) [J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2007, 33:S1 - 75.
  • 2Leeds FH, Gilfillan RS. Importance of profunda femoris artery in the revascularization of the ischemic limb[J]. Arch Surg, 1961, 82:25 - 31.
  • 3Morris GC Jr, Edwards E, Cooley D, et al. Surgical importance of profunda femoris artery. Analysis of 102 cases with combined aortoiliac and femoropopliteal occlusive disease treated by revascularization of deep femoral artery [J]. Arch Surg, 1961, 82:32 - 37.
  • 4Waibel PP, Wolff G. The collateral circulation in occlusions of the femoral artery: an experimental study [J]. Surgery, 1966, 60:912 - 918.
  • 5王洪剑,邓钢,秦永林,李国昭,柏志斌,何仕诚,郭金和,丁惠娟,沈志萍.球囊扩张或(和)支架植入术治疗股浅动脉狭窄或闭塞的中远期疗效[J].介入放射学杂志,2012,21(10):810-815. 被引量:19
  • 6周玉斌,吴丹明.股浅动脉长段闭塞的治疗选择[J].介入放射学杂志,2010,19(10):831-834. 被引量:5
  • 7Varty K, London NJ, Ratliff DA, et al. Percutaneous angioplasty of the profunda femoris artery: a safe and effective endovascular technique[J]. Eur J Vasc Surg, 1993, 7:483 - 487.
  • 8Silva JA, White C J, Ramee SR, et al. Percutaneous profundaplasty in the treatment of lower extremity ischemia: results of long-term surveillance[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2001, 8:75 - 82.

二级参考文献30

  • 1王成刚,吴丹明,周玉斌,易巍,贾琪,孙雨莘.复合式手术分期治疗下肢多节段动脉硬化闭塞症[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(6):587-589. 被引量:15
  • 2Met R,Van Lienden KP,Koelemay MJ,et al.Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease:a systematic review[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2008,31:687-697.
  • 3Nishibe T,Kondo Y,Nishibe M,et al.Stent placement for superficial femoral arterial occlusive disease,in high-risk patients:preliminary results[J].Surg Today,2009,39:21-26.
  • 4Antoniou GA,Koutsias S,Antoniou SA,et al.Remote endarterectomy for long segment superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.A systematic review[J].Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2008,36:310-318.
  • 5Kamiya C,Sakamoto S,Tamori Y,et al.Long-term outcome after pereutaneous peripheral intervention vs medical treatment for patients with superficial femoral artery occlusive disease[J].Circ J,2008,72:734-739.
  • 6Iijima R,Byrne RA,Dibra A,et al.Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction:a pooled analysis of individual patient data from seven randomized trials[J].Rev Esp Cardiol,2009,62:354-364.
  • 7Nicoloff AD,Taylor LM Jr,McLafferty RB,et al.Patient recovery after infrainguinal bypass grafting for limb salvage[J].J Vasc Surg,1998,27:256-266.
  • 8Chung J,Bartelson BB.Hiatt WR,et al.Wound healing and functional outcomes after infrainguinal bypass with reversed saphenous vein for critical limb ischemia[J].J Vasc Surg,2006,43:1183-1190.
  • 9LaMuraglia GM,Conrad MF,Chung T,et al.Significant perioperative morbidity accompanies contemporary infrainguinal bypass surgery:a NSQIP report[C].Presented at the Society for Vascular Society at Vascular Annual Meeting,San Diego,CA,2008:5-9.
  • 10Chew DK,Owens CD,Belkin M,et al.Bypass in the absence of ipsilateral greater saphenous vein:safety and superiority of the contralateral greater saphenous vein[J].J Vasc Surg,2002,35:1085-1092.

共引文献21

同被引文献72

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部