摘要
目的观察米索前列醇不同给药途径终止早期妊娠的临床效果。方法选择到该院门诊自愿要求药物流产终止妊娠的早期妊娠妇女146例,按就诊次序分成A、B两组,各73例。A组米索前列醇口服给药,B组米索前列醇阴道给药。观察两种给药途径的流产效果。结果 A组完全流产率为91.8%,B组完全流产率为97.3%,两组流产效果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论早期药物流产方案中,以米索前列醇阴道给药优于口服给药。
Objective To compare the differences of two misoprostol’s route of administration in the early drug abortion scheme.Methods One hundred and forty-six early pregnancy women who demanded drug abortion were randomly divided into group A and group B（each group=73）.The abortion effects of two misoprostol’s route of administration in the early drug abortion scheme were abserved,including the oral administration（A gruop） and the vagina’administration（B group）.Results The rate of abortion of A group was 91.8% while that of B group was 97.3%.There was significant difference in the abortion rate between two groups（P＆lt;0.05）.Conclusion In the early drug abortion scheme,misoprostol’s vagina administration has better effect than oral administration.
出处
《中国临床新医学》
2013年第3期243-244,共2页
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词
药物流产
米索前列醇
给药途径
Drug abortion
Misoprostol
Route of administration
