期刊文献+

肱骨近端锁定钢板与三叶草钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析 被引量:17

Comparison of locking compression plate and cloverleaf plate in treatment of senile proximal humeral fracture
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较肱骨近端锁定钢板与三叶草钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效。方法 2009年1月至2011年12月肱骨近端骨折老年患者50例,其中使用肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗27例(锁定钢板组),三叶草钢板治疗23例(三叶草钢板组),术后随访1个月至1.5年,观察骨折愈合、肩关节活动功能、手术切口疼痛以及手术并发症等情况,Neer肩关节评分系统评估其疗效。结果2组手术时间、术中出血比较,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。Neer肩关节评分:术后1个月、3个月,2组的评分比较,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义;术后1年,2组评分比较,P>0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论肱骨近端锁定钢板与三叶草钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折临床疗效均满意,但是三叶草钢板与骨面的接触面积更大,肱骨头缺血坏死发生几率高些,肱骨近端锁定钢板更具功能锻炼早、并发症少、功能恢复好优势。 Objective To compare the effect of locking compression plate and cloverleaf plate in the treatment of senile proximal humer- al fracture, Methods 50 old patients with proximal humeral fracture in our hospital from January 2009 to December 2011 were divided into locking compression plate group(27 )and cloverleaf plate group(23 ). The follow-up was from 1 -18 months, the fracture healing, function of shoulder,incision pain and related complication were observed in both group. Neer shoulder scoring system was used to statistically analyze. Results There was significant differences between 2 groups in operative time and intraoperative bleeding ( P 〈 0.05 ). The Neer score of loc- king compression plate and cloverleaf plate were compared 1 month and 3 months after surgery. And there was significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). While there was no significant differences between 2 groups 1 year later(P 〉 0.05 ). Conculsion Both 2 groups were satisfied with the efficacy. But the contact area of cloverleaf plate was larger. So the rate of ischemic necrosis of humeral head was higher. Locking com- pression plate with the advantages of less complication and good recovery was more suitable for old people with proximal humeral fracture.
出处 《局解手术学杂志》 2013年第2期190-191,共2页 Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
关键词 肱骨近端骨折 肱骨近端锁定钢板 三叶草钢板 proximal humeral fracture locking compression plate cloverleaf plate
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献46

共引文献88

同被引文献118

  • 1罗亚平,王勤业,徐忠良,汤峰,常小波,冯夏莺,习洪波.肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(S1):7-8. 被引量:9
  • 2罗建军.锁定加压钢板小切口入路治疗老年肱骨近端骨折临床体会[J].现代养生,2014,0(24):126-127. 被引量:2
  • 3王健,李维军,庞瑞明,盛朝辉,陈海良,陈义泉,任平.锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(1):36-37. 被引量:45
  • 4彭伟.王亮.锁定加压钢板和普通钢板治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨骨折的疗效分析对比[J].中国骨折疏松杂志,2010,16(10):37-38.
  • 5Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fracturues I. Classification and evaluation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg,2010, 52(6) : 1077-1089.
  • 6申晟.锁定钢板与交锁髓内钉治疗老年肱骨近端二部分外科颈骨折的疗效分析[D].大连医科大学,2013.
  • 7王晓,龙凯,张卫东,等.探讨锁定加压钢板小切口入路治疗老年肱骨近端骨折临床效果[J].临床骨科杂志,2013,22(19):1124-1126.
  • 8WAGNER M. General principles f or the clinical use of the LCP [J]. Injury,2013,34(2) :31 -42.
  • 9GEIGER E V, MAIER M, KELM A,et al. Functional outcome and complications following PHILOS plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2010,44( 1 ) : 1 -6.
  • 10M. Ahmad,R. Nanda,A.S. Bajwa,J. Candal-Couto,S. Green,A.C. Hui.Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: When does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?[J].Injury.2007(3)

引证文献17

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部