期刊文献+

基于256层螺旋CT头颈部扫描的最优辐射剂量节省模式的实验研究 被引量:7

The experimental study of optimal radiation dosage saving mode based on the scan of head and neck using 256-slice CT
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨在保证影像质量前提下的头颈部256层CT最优低剂量节省模式。方法应用组织等效头颈部模型置于Philips Brilliance256层CT机以标准模式(400mAs)和低剂量节省模式进行分别扫描,其中低剂量节省模式包括自动管电流选择(ACS)、螺旋剂量节省(Helical Dose Saving)、X-Y平面动态电流调节(D-DOM)、Z轴动态电流调节技术(Z-DOM)等进行组合,测量、记录模型蝶鞍、下颌骨和胸骨柄各部位CT值、CT值噪声标准差(SD),分别行方差分析。结果共有8种组合模式可降低辐射剂量。即:①ACS;②ACS+Helical;③ACS+(D-DOM);④ACS+(Z-DOM);⑤ACS+Helical+(D-DOM);⑥ACS+(D-DOM)+(Z-DOM);⑦ACS+Helical+(Z-DOM);⑧ACS+Helical+(D-DOM)+(Z-DOM)。与标准剂量CTDI26.5mGy,DLP1276.8mGy*cm相比,CT不同剂量节省方式扫描时,在保证图像质量的同时,辐射剂量可节省11.21%~68.12%。采用最优剂量节省模式ACS+Helical+(D-DOM)+(Z-DOM),CTDI从26mGy降低到11.8mGy,DLP从1134.6mGy*cm降低到504.9mGy*cm。蝶鞍、下颌骨和胸骨柄水平相同部位软组织和骨骼的CT值在各组间差异均无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。蝶鞍、下颌骨水平骨骼结构测量的SD值有统计学差别(P<0.01),而胸骨柄水平骨骼SD值和蝶鞍、下颌骨、胸骨柄水平相同部位软组织SD值间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在头颈部螺旋CT扫描中,恰当运用螺旋CT剂量节省模式,辐射剂量可大大降低。 Objective To investigate the optimal low dose 256-slice CT scan mode of the head and neck on the promise to ensure image quality. Methods A head and neck phantom equivalent to human tissue was scaned by Philips Brilliance 256 slice-CT at standard dose(400 mAs)and low dose saving mode scanning, the low-dose saving mode includes automatic current selection (ACS), helical dose saving, dynamic angular dose modulation (D-DOM), Z-axis dose modulation (Z- DOM), and the combination of the above mode. The CT value and the noise standard deviation (SD) of which in site of the phantom were recorded, and variance analysis was used to dertermine the variane between different dosage saving mode. Results There was only eight kinds of dose saving modes which could reduce the radiation doseage, that is ACS, ACS+ Helical, ACS+ (INDOM), ACS+ (Z-DOM), ACS+ Helical+ (D-DOM), ACS+ (D-DOM) + (Z-DOM), ACS+ Helical+ (Z-DOM), and ACS+ Helical+ (D-DOM) + (Z-DOM). Compared with the radiation dosage (CTDI 26.5 mGy, DLP 1276.8 of mGy *cm) using standard protol, the dosage saving ranged to 11.21%-68.12% when used different dosage saving mode ensuring the quality of image. Used the optimal dosage saving mode ACS+ Helical + (D-DOM)+ (Z- DOM), the CTDI could decreased from 26mGy to 11.8 mGy, and DLP could decreased from 1134.6 mGy+ cm to 504.9 mGy * cm. There was no statistical difference in CT value between the groups in soft and bone tissue in any sites of the phantom (all P value≥0.05). There was statistical difference in SD value between the groups in bone tissue in sites of the sella turcica and mandible of the phantom (all P value〈0.01). There was no statistical difference in SD value between the groups in bone tissue in site of sternum handle and in soft in any sites of the phantom (all P value≥0.05). Conclusion With proper use of radation dosage saving mode, the radiation dose can be greatly reduced on the spiral CT scan of the head and neck.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2013年第3期481-485,共5页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 头颈部 辐射剂量 体层摄影术 X线计算机 噪声 Head and neck Radiation dosage Tomography, X-ray computed Noise
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Ruegsegger P, Anliker M, Dambacher M. Quantification of trabecular bone with low dose computed tomography [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1981, 5: 384-390.
  • 2朱晓华,李士骏,薛永明,邵江,史景云,尤正千.胸部CT低剂量扫描的图像质量与吸收剂量关系分析[J].中华放射学杂志,2003,37(10):945-950. 被引量:136
  • 3Hagtvedt T, Aalokken TM, Notthellen J, et al. A new low- dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis [J]. Eur Radiol, 2003, 3: 976- 980.
  • 4McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA Physics. Tutorial for resi- dents: topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT [J]. RadioGraph- ics, 2002, 22: 1541-1553.
  • 5Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimize radia- tion dose for pediatric body application of single-detector heli- cal CT: strategies at large children's hospital [J]. AJR, 2001, 176:303 306.
  • 6Weidemann J, Stature G, Galanski M, et al. Comparison of the image quality of various fixed and dose modulated proto- zols for soft tissue neck CT on a GE Lightspeed scanner [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 69: 473-477.
  • 7Daly MJ, Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, et al. Intraoperative :one-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: assess- aaent of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype[J]. Vied Phvs, 2006. 33, 3767-3780.
  • 8Mullins ME, Lev MH, Bove P, et al. Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT[J]. AJNR, 2004, 25: 533-538.
  • 9van Straten M, Deak P, Shrimpton PC, et al. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the esti mation of organ and effective doses in X ray computed tomo- graphy [J]. Med Phys, 2009, 36: 4881-4889.
  • 10中华人民共和国国家标准GB/TIT589-1998.X射线计算机断层摄影装置影像质量保证检测规范[M].北京:国家质量技术监督局、卫生部,1999.14.

二级参考文献18

  • 1王学礼.医用CT图像常见伪影成因及矫正分析[J].CT理论与应用研究(中英文),2004,13(3):1-8. 被引量:22
  • 2胡荣慧,宋光义,韩丹,许立奇,张良,成友华.螺旋CT检测肺结节的低剂量优化选择及应用[J].放射学实践,2005,20(7):604-608. 被引量:10
  • 3陈捷,赵秀丽,武峰,崔艳丽,胡大一.我国14省市中老年人肥胖超重流行现状及其与高血压患病率的关系[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(40):2830-2834. 被引量:166
  • 4Nitta N, Takahashi M, Murata K, et al. Ultra low-dose helical CT of the chest: evaluation in clinical cases. Radiat Med,1999,17:1-7.
  • 5Swensen S J, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology, 2005,235 : 259 -265.
  • 6Gierada DS, Pilgram TK, Ford M, et al. Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. Radiology,2008,246:265-272.
  • 7Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, et all. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology,2002,222:773-781.
  • 8Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, et al. Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology, 1990,175:729-731.
  • 9中华人民共和国国家标准GB/T17589-1998.X射线计算机断层摄影装置影像质量保证检测规范.北京:国家质量技术监督局、卫生部,1999:1-4.
  • 10Diederich S, Lenzen H, Windmann R, et al. Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT. Radiology, 1999,213:289-298.

共引文献191

同被引文献48

  • 1姚雪松,罗德红,李琳,吴宁,周纯武.甲状腺病变的多层螺旋CT诊断及鉴别诊断[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(9):697-700. 被引量:24
  • 2Sherma SI. Thyroid carcinoma [J]. Lancet, 2003, 361 (9356): 501-511.
  • 3Davies L, Welch HG. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States,1973-2002 [J]. JAMA, 2006, 295(18) : 2164-2167.
  • 4Sakai O, Curtin HD, Romo LV, et al. Lymph node pathology: benign proliferative, lymphoma, and metastatic disease [J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2000, 38(5): 979-998.
  • 5Weber AL, Randolph G, Aksoy FG. The thyroid and parathyroid glands: CT and MR imaging and correlation with pa- thology and clinical findings[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2000, 38(5): 1105-1129.
  • 6Wang N, Xu Y, Ge C, et al. Association of sonographically detected calcification with thyroid carcinoma [J]. Head neck, 2006, 28(12): 1077-1083.
  • 7Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation-multicenter retrospective study[J]. Radiology, 2008, 247(3): 762-770.
  • 8Siegel MJ , Schmidt B, Bradley D,et al.Radiation dose and image quality in pedi-atric CT: effect of technical factors andphantom size and shape [J]. Radiology,2004, 233(2); 515-522.
  • 9American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2008). Themeasurement, reporting, and management of radiation dosein CT: report of AAPM Task Group 23,CT Dosimetry Diag-nostic Imaging Council CT Committee. AAPM report no.96American Association of Physicists in Medicine, CollegePark, MD? January, 2008.
  • 10Einstein AJ , Henzlova MJ , Rajagopalan S. Estimating riskof cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slicecomputed tomography coronary angiography[J].JAMA.2007’ 298(3): 317-323.

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部