摘要
对现行的绩效工资制度进行了分析,认为一个单位是否制定了科学、公正、合理的评分内容与标准,直接关系到科研人员的收入与报酬,关系到对科研人员所作贡献的认可与尊重程度。对保持稳定、调动科研人员的积极性和创造性、推动单位科研事业顺利发展至关重要。以量化评分中最能体现农业科技人员的科研水平、能力和工作业绩的获奖成果、发表论文、项目研究这三项评分内容为例,对其量化评分标准的制定和考评进行了分析、比较和讨论。提出了采取量化评分标准考评时,要坚持"一杆称"和"一票否决制"的观点。
The current performance-based pay system was analyzed,it was thought that whether or not the grading standard is scientific and fair and reasonable directly relates to the pay and approval of researchers＇ work.The grading standard plays a vital role in keeping stable and inspiring the enthusiasm and creativity and helping the researches to develop further.Taking awarded achievements and paper publishing and project researches as examples,how to formulate and appraise the grading standard was analyzed,compared and discussed.The principles of insisting consistent and defeated by just one vote were introduced to reference for other institutes in the industry.
出处
《安徽农业科学》
CAS
2013年第6期2770-2771,2774,共3页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
关键词
工资晋级
评分标准
分析讨论
Salary promotion
Grading standard
Analysis and discussion
