期刊文献+

E-钙黏附蛋白表达与乳腺癌及三阴性乳腺癌预后的相关性研究 被引量:3

Correlation between E-cadherin expression and the prognosis of breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨E-钙黏附蛋白表达对判断乳腺癌及三阴性乳腺癌预后的意义。方法用随机数字法调取本院2003~2005年浸润性乳腺癌(浸润性小叶癌除外)280例,用免疫组化法检测E-钙黏附蛋白表达情况。Log Rank法对比生存曲线,分析E-钙黏附蛋白表达与乳腺癌及三阴性乳腺癌预后的相关性。结果在280例乳腺癌患者中,E-钙黏附蛋白表达阴性患者较E-钙黏附蛋白表达阳性患者预后差(生存率对比Log Rank=19.99,P=0.00;无瘤生存率对比Log Rank=21.42,P=0.00)。在32例三阴性乳腺癌患者中,E-钙黏附蛋白表达阴性患者较E-钙黏附蛋白表达阳性患者预后差(生存率对比Log Rank=4.67,P=0.03;无瘤生存率对比:Log Rank=6.54,P=0.01)。结论 E-钙黏附蛋白是乳腺癌及三阴性乳腺癌的预后因子,有助于进一步划分三阴性乳腺癌的亚型。 Objective To investigate the clinical significance of E-cadherin expression for the prognosis of breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods We randomly enrolled 280 cases of invasive breast cancer in our hospital from 2003 to 2005 ( the patients with invasive lobular carcinomas were exempted). E-cadherin expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Log Rank survival curve was used to analyze the correlation between E-cadherin expression and the prognosis of breast cancer and TNBC. Results In all the 280 cases, the prognosis of E-cadherin-negative patients was significantly worse than that of E-cadherin-positive patients ( overall survival : Log Rank = 19. 99, P = 0. O0 ; disease-free survival : Log Rank = 21.42, P=0. 00). In the 32 TNBC cases, the prognosis of E-cadherin-negative patients was significantly worse than that of E-cadherin-positive patients ( overall survival : Log Rank = 4. 67, P --- 0. 03 ; disease-free survival : Log Rank = 6. 54, P = 0. 01 ). Conclusion E-cadherin is a prognostic factor for breast cancer and TNBC, which might be useful to further classify the subgroups of TNBC.
作者 孔德娣
出处 《中华乳腺病杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2013年第1期39-41,共3页 Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 分子亚型 三阴性乳腺癌 E-钙黏附蛋白 breast neoplasms molecular subtype triple negative breast cancer E-cadherin
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献52

  • 1周徽,朱尤庆,黄梅芳.Syndecan-1和E-Cadherin蛋白在散发性大肠癌中的表达及意义[J].中国医师杂志,2005,7(2):215-216. 被引量:8
  • 2Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature, 2000, 406 : 747-752.
  • 3Kreike B, van Kouwenhove M, Horlings H, et al. Gene expression profiling and histopathological characterization of triple- negative/basal-like breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res, 2007, 9 : 404-405.
  • 4Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13: 4429-4434.
  • 5Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, et al. Descriptive Analysis of Estrogen Receptor (ER) -Negative, Progesterone Receptor (PR) - Negative, and HER2-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer, the Socalled Triple-Negative Phenotype. Cancer, 2007, 109: 1721-1728.
  • 6Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer, 2007, 109 : 25-32.
  • 7Carey LA, Perou CM, livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtype, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA, 2006, 295:2492-2502.
  • 8Minn AJ, Gupta GP, Siegel PM, et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature, 2005,436:518-524.
  • 9Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Sarrio D, Honrado E, et al. Prognostic significance of basal-like phenotype and fascin expression in node-negative invasive breast carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res, 2006, 12: 1533-1539.
  • 10Bidard FC, Conforti R, Boulet T, et al. Does triple-negative phenotype accurately identify basal-like tumor? An immunohistochemical analysis based on 143 triple-negative breast cancers. Ann Oncol, 2007, 18:1285-1286.

共引文献44

同被引文献38

  • 1Li BD, Sicard MA, Ampil F, et al. Trimodal thera py for inflammatory breast cancer: a surgeon's perspective [J]. Oncology, 2010,79 ( 1/2 ) : 3-12.
  • 2Dawood S. Biology and management of inflammatory breast cancer [J]. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2010,10(2) :209-220.
  • 3Arias-Pulido H, Chaher N, Gong Y, et al. Tumor stromal vascular endothelial growth factor A is predictive of poor outcome in inflammatory breast cancer[J]. BMC Cancer,2012,12:298.
  • 4Kashiwagi S, Yashiro M, Takashima T,et al. Significance of E-cadherin expression in triple-negative breast cancer [J]. Br J Cancer, 2010,103 (2) : 249-255.
  • 5Lan C, Liu JM, Liu TW,et al. Erb-b2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer specimens read as 2+ in analysis [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2005,124( 1 ) :97-102.
  • 6Gong Y. Pathologic aspects of inflammatory breast cancer: part 2. Biologic insights into its aggressive phenotype [J]. Semin Oncol, 2008,35 ( 1 ) : 33-40.
  • 7Ben Hamida A, Labidi IS, Mrad K,et al. Markers of subtypes in inflammatory breast cancer studied by immunohistochemistry: prominent expression of P-cadherin [ J ]. BMC Cancer, 2008,8 : 28.
  • 8Levine PH, Portera CC, Hoffman H J, et al. Evaluation oflymphangiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor D and E-cadherin in distinguishing inflammatory from locally advanced breast cancer[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2012,12(4) :232-239.
  • 9yon Minckwitz G, Sinn HP, Raab G, et al. Clinical response after two cycles compared to HER2, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in independently predicting a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast[ J ]. Breast Cancer Res, 2008,10(2) :R30.
  • 10Aomatsu S, Abigail S, Kelly K, et al. Neoadjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer [ J ]. J Surg Oncol, 2011,103 (4):348- 357.

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部