期刊文献+

两种血小板计数方法的比较及其评价 被引量:7

Comparison of two platelet count methods and their evaluation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 摘要目的:比较两种不同血小板计数方法的准确性。方法:收集PLT〈100×10^9/L,在LH750机上检测,PLT计数无异常提示,50例标本(A组)。收集PLT〈100×10^9/L,在LH750机上检测,PIT计数异常提示,50例标本(B组)。排除血小板聚集对血小板计数影响,分别进行相差显微镜镜检法、Sysmex XE-5000PLT-I和PLT-O血小板计数比较。结果:A组数据进行比较,LH750血细胞计数仪PLT-I原理检测PLT,Sysmex XE-5000PLT-I原理检测PLT、PLT-O原理检测PLT,以及手工计数PLT,两两比较P〉0.05,差异无统计学意义。B组数据进行比较,LH750血细胞计数仪PLT-I原理检测PLT,Sysme xXE-5000PIJ-I原理检测PLT、P〉0.05差异无统计学意义。LH750血细胞计数仪PLT-I原理检测PLT,Sysmex XE-5000PLT-I原理检测PLT与Sysmex XE-5000PLT-O原理检测PLT比较,P〈0.05差异无统计学意义,Sysmex XE-5000PLT-0原理检测PLT与手工计数比较P〉0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论:对低异常血小板,尤其存在大血小板标本,为了避免电阻抗法血小板计数假性减少,可进行较为方便的PLT.O法计数加以纠正,必要时进行较为繁琐的镜检法计数,为临床提供更为准确的血小板数据。 Objective:To compare the accuracy between the two platelet count methods. Methods:PLT 〈 100×10^9/ L specimens selected and detected with no abnormal indications of PLT counts on LH-750 were assigned into group A, while PLT 〈 100 ×10^9/L specimens detected with abnormal indications of PLT counts on LH-750 were into group B (n = 50, each). The PLT-I and PLT-O platelet counts were detected respectively by phase contrast microscope and Sysmex XE-5000, excluding the effects of platelet aggregation on platelet count. Results:In group A, PLT specimens were respectively detected by LH750 hematology analyzer PLT-I principle, Sysmex XE-5000 PLT-I principle, PLT-O principle and manual counting, with no significant difference (P 〉 0. 05 ). While in group B, PLT specimens were respectively detected by LH750 hematology analyzer PLT-I principle and Sysmex XE-5000 PLT-I principle, with no significant difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). There was no difference among LH750 hematology analyzer PLT-I principle, Sysmex XE-5000 PLT-I principle and Sysmex XE- 5000 PLT-O principle ( P 〈 0.05 ) , nor between Sysmex XE-5000 PLT-O principle and manual counting ( P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion : For platelets with low abnormality, particularly the large platelet specimens, the relatively convenient PLT-O method could be used to rectify so as to avoid the pseudothrombocytopenia detected by impedance technology. The relatively complex microscopy could be used if necessary in order to provide more accurate platelet data.
出处 《广州医学院学报》 2012年第5期59-61,共3页 Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
关键词 血细胞分析仪 血小板计数 准确性 相差显微镜 PLT-I PLT-O hematology analyzer platelet count accuracy phase contrast microscope PLT-I PLT-O
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1T hoenes W, Storkel S, Rempelt HJ. Human chromophobe cell renalcarcinoma[ J]. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol, 1985,48 ( 3 ) : 207-217.
  • 2Thoenes W, Storkel S, Rempeh H J, et al. Chromophobe cell renal carcinoma and its variants: a report on 32 cases [J]. J Pathol, 1988, 155(4) :277-287.
  • 3廖忠.血细胞分析仪测定血小板的影响因素分析[J].广东医学院学报,2005,23(5):611-611. 被引量:20
  • 4王羽.全国临床检验操作规程[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:1-20.
  • 5Warren GR , Robert KA. Optical technology in blood cell counting[ J] . Sysmex J Int , 1999,9 ( 1 ) :21 - 30.

二级参考文献3

共引文献19

同被引文献67

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部